• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Online Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part III

0
by Renee Kolar

Monday, Apr 14, 2014


Tweet

Online Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool

Part III

 Part I | Part II | Part IV | Part V

By: Burkley Wombwell

III. Providers of Online Dispute Resolution

Online Dispute Resolution, naturally, exists online. Attempting a general Internet search for ODR providers will provide a potentially overwhelming amount of results. Currently, over 60 academically recognized ORD providers exist.[1] Fair consideration cannot be given to each provider of online dispute resolution, but an examination of a few examples reveals how the process operates.

Major Arbitration Providers and ODR services

In the world of Alternative Dispute Resolution, the American Arbitration Association (AAA), the International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution (CPR), and Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (JAMS) are the leading arbitration providers, and each organization has in some way incorporated ODR into their programs.

AAA provides online services for its users, including arbitration clause-building, claim filing, case management, and electronic document transfer.[2] Also, at mediation.org, a division of AAA, an online dispute resolution service is available.[3] AAA offers to conduct the entire mediation process online, with no telephone sessions and no face-to-face meetings if the dispute involves only two parties and neither the claim nor the counterclaim exceeds $10,000.[4] If this process is chosen, a trained AAA staff mediator is assigned to handle the matter from start to finish, the mediator is usually appointed within 48 hours of receipt of the responding party’s agreement to mediate, a flat fee of $200 includes the mediator’s time (no additional costs are incurred), and the mediation is conducted via AAA chat rooms and Instant Messaging (IM).[5] Issues are usually resolved within a 30-day time period, joint discussions between the parties are facilitated by the Mediator in an online chat-room environment, and private discussions between the Mediator and each party can be held individually.[6] Furthermore, the international division of AAA, the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR) has a manufacturer/supplier online dispute resolution program, which is designed to help manufacturers and suppliers resolve small disputes quickly, fairly, and inexpensively.[7] From start to finish the process is designed to take no longer than 66 days, consisting of two phases, negotiation and arbitration, at the end of which the dispute is either settled or decided by an arbitrator.[8] The filing fee is $500, and should the dispute proceed to arbitration an additional $1000 fee is charged, and similar to AAA’s online mediation, the dispute cannot exceed $10,000.[9] This is a desirable process for manufacturers and suppliers who want to quickly resolve a dispute and continue with business. As the demand for online dispute resolution grows, it is likely that AAA will expand its ODR services beyond small claims and manufacturer/supplier disputes.

The International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution (CPR) has devoted particular attention to online dispute resolution. CPR has acknowledged the impact of the Internet on cross-border transactions and the deficiency of processes for resolving issues that may arise in the context.[10] In response, CPR is involved in several initiatives to leverage ODR in business relationships. First, CPR is working with modria.com, an ODR platform based in Silicon Valley.[11] Launched in 2008, Modria licensed and further developed the ODR platform used by eBay and PayPal to enable its use in other business contexts, which can be adapted to support a wide variety of business to business (B2B) ADR processes.[12] Currently, CPR is working with Modria to develop online processes and rules that can be customized to fit a range of B2B disputes.[13] Second, CPR is participating in the efforts of UNCITRAL Working Group III, which is focused on developing generic rules and procedures governing ODR for business to business and business to consumer transactions internationally.[14] The progress of Working Group III will be covered in greater detail in the section IV “ODR in the International Context.”

To a lesser extent, Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (JAMS) has also expanded into the realm of online dispute resolution services. Like AAA, JAMS provides electronic submission of cases and an electronic filing system.[15] Also, JAMS provides a Virtual Conference Room, so that offsite parties can participate in dispute resolution, particularly the hearing process, through a web conference.[16] Although JAMS currently does not offer an official ODR procedure, it is likely that as their competitors expand into the arena, JAMS will follow.

 Other ODR providers

The adoption of ODR services by major ADR service providers should not come as a surprise, especially considering the assortment of providers solely dedicated to ODR that exist on the Internet. As mentioned before, over 60 providers of ODR currently exist. Although these ODR services have a common goal in mind, they have slight variations and offer distinctive features.

SmartSettle, for example, offers an online negotiation system centered around collaboration, saving time, and preserving relationships.[17] SmartSettle can cover a large array of disputes and provides four products, each tailored to meet the user’s particular needs.[18] SmartSettle Observer (Lite), designed for trainees, observers and parties in online cases, has all the features needed for evaluation but may not be used commercially except in an online case created and facilitated by a licensed user of SmartSettle Pro.; however it can be used in two commercial cases online without charge.[19] SmartSettle Decider is a multivariate stand-alone support system, suited for solving complex problems for individuals, and it can help the user clarify the issues and compare alternatives in complex situations.[20] SmartSettle Negotiator is designed for professional negotiators; it provides secure real-time communication with other Negotiators and generates optimal solutions based on the preferences of parties located around the world.[21] Finally, SmartSettle Pro, the flagship product for facilitators, provides a tool for secure multi-party negotiations and is designed for simultaneous facilitation of any number of cases.[22] SmartSettle prices can range from $700 to $2000, however SmartSettle Pro is priced upon request.[23] With a focus on e-negotiation, SmartSettle is a good example of a well-developed online disputes resolution provider.

Another provider, Juripax, “the worldwide leader in online mediation software,” focuses on the ODR system and the technology behind dispute resolution.[24] Juripax is ideally suited for fully online proceedings, but can also supplement and be integrated into meeting-based procedures.[25] With 10 years of experience, Juripax allows for streamlined textual, asynchronous communication between the parties that is always transmitted through the mediator.[26] The process consists of three phases, part one (preparation, diagnostics, mediator evaluation), part two (mediation), and part three (resolution).[27] Like SmartSettle, Juripax offers four editions of its services: Juripax Roleplay (free online demo), Juripax Community (introduction package), Juripax Mediator (single user), and Juripax Professional (multi user and case administration).[28] The system is based out of the Netherlands, with agents in Germany and the United States, and prices range from 49 Euros to 1299 Euros, with options to add on services.[29]

VirtualCourthouse, yet another example, is a “web-based combination of multimedia technologies and business processes, integrated with a customer-friendly user interface. [The] system replicates the current process of dispute resolution in an online environment, removing the constraints of time, expense, and distance…”[30] To file a case, the parties and representatives submit a brief description, then select 3 or more mediators/arbitrators, rank them, and send the list to the opposing party along with an invitation to participate in ADR through VirtualCourthouse.[31] Once the process begins, the parties submit their case online, schedule a meeting or video conference, and use the provider’s secure and confidential asynchronous messaging system.[32] Filing a case is $50 per party, an online decision and simple online neutral case evaluation of an hour or less each cost $300, and beyond that fees are assessed at the neutral’s published hourly rate.[33] One interesting feature offered by VirtualCourthouse is “Mediator Marketing,” which “provides the mediation community with the tools to develop a successful strategy to increase caseloads and transition to the Internet… The only online dispute system that provides a marketing utility and a selection component. Not only can a mediator create a wide Internet presence but is also available for selection by a party who starts a case using VirtualCourthouse,” selection and marketing begins at $5 per month.[34] The main focus of VirtualCourthouse is “fair, fast, and reliable” dispute resolution, but marketing and case management services for mediators are also available.

Although each supplier has different qualities and features, the common goal among ODR providers is to adapt to the customer’s needs and provide a dispute resolution mechanism that can be fully utilized online, enhancing efficiency, economy, and satisfaction.

Stay tuned for more on ODR in the international context!

 


[1] ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION: THEORY AND PRACTICE: A TREATISE ON TECHNOLOGY AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION, xvii-xviii (Daniel Rainey, Ethan Katsh, & Mohamed S. Abdel Wahab eds., The Hauge: Eleven International, 2012).

[2] AAA, http://www.adr.org/aaa/ShowPDF?doc=ADRSTG_015216 (last visited December 4, 2013).

[3] Online Mediation for Claims under $10,000, AAA, mediation.org, https://www.mediation.org/mediation/faces/mediation_services/online_mediation?_afrLoop=2823237867655724&_afrWindowMode=0&_afrWindowId=ou7unu8ox_137#%40%3F_afrWindowId%3Dou7unu8ox_137%26_afrLoop%3D2823237867655724%26_afrWindowMode%3D0%26_adf.ctrl-state%3Dou7unu8ox_169,  https://services.adr.org/eroom/faces/welcome_and_steps.jspx (last visited December 4, 2013).

[4] Id.

[5] Id.

[6] Id.

[7] ICDR Manufacturer/Supplier Online Dispute Resolution Program, AAA, http://www.adr.org/aaa/ShowPDF?doc=ADRSTG_015216 (last visited December 4, 2013).

[8] Id.

[9] Id.

[10] International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution, CPR Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Overview

[11] Id.

[12] Id.

[13] Id.

[14] Id.

[15] JAMS THE RESOLUTION EXPERTS,

http://www.jamsadr.com/electronic-filing/, http://www.jamsadr.com/virtual-conference/ (last visited December 4, 2013).

[16] Id.

[17] SMARTSETTLE, http://www.smartsettle.com/ (last visited December 4, 2013).

[18] Id.

[19] Id.

[20] Id.

[21] Id.

[22] Id.

[23] Id.

[24] JURIPAX TECHNOLOGY FOR EARLY DISPUTE RESOLUTION, http://www.juripax.com/EN/home.php (last visited December 4, 2013).

[25] Id.

[26] Id.

[27] Id.

[28] Juripax, supra note 39, http://www.juripax.com/EN/products.php.

[29] Id.

[30] VIRTUALCOURTHOUSE: ONLINE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION SYSTEM, http://www.virtualcourthouse.com/ (last visited December 4, 2013).

[31] Id.

[32] Id.

[33] Id.

[34] Id.

Related Posts

  • Online Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part IVOnline Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part IV
  •  Online Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part V Online Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part V
  • Online Dispute Resolution:  An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part IIOnline Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part II
  • Online Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet an Effective Tool Part IOnline Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet an Effective Tool Part I
  • When Should You Choose JAMS, AAA or CPR Rules?When Should You Choose JAMS, AAA or CPR Rules?
  • Fairness, Trust, and Security in Online Dispute ResolutionFairness, Trust, and Security in Online Dispute Resolution

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Renee Kolar

Renée Kolar received her J.D. from the University of Texas School of Law in December 2012 and passed the February 2013 Texas Bar Exam. Her experience living abroad and studying translation taught her that misunderstandings between people arise not just from their language differences, but also from the absence of a shared cultural background.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy