• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Online Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet an Effective Tool Part I

0
by Renee Kolar

Thursday, Apr 10, 2014


Tweet

The fourth and final paper in the student paper blog series is written by Ms. Burkley Wombwell and discusses the effectiveness of Online Dispute Resolution. Here is the intro!

Online Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part I

Part II | Part III | Part IV| Part V

By: Burkley Wombwell

I.  Introduction

Technology is becoming an ever more integrated part of society, playing a role—or at the very least touching—nearly every aspect of daily life. The world of arbitration is no exception to this phenomenon. Parties are increasingly taking advantage of online dispute resolution (ODR) to resolve issues. This is not particularly surprising, as the world of alternative dispute resolution is growing and people are looking for faster, cheaper, easier ways to solve their problems.

Online Dispute Resolution can take many forms, similar to traditional Alternative Dispute Resolution (negotiation, mediation, arbitration). For the purposes of this report, however, the focus will be on the progression and implementation of ODR in its various forms, rather than on the distinctions between “types” of online alternative dispute resolution methods (such as e-negotiation, e-mediation, e-arbitration). Together, these tools combine to form the field of online dispute resolution, and the concentration here is on the field as a whole.

ODR scholarship is fairly limited. Aside from a handful of law journal articles, most of the information on ODR exists where the process itself was born: on the Internet. As a writer for the Baylor Law Review observed,

Most commentators mainly have discussed use of the Internet for filing, scheduling, and managing ADR processes, or for numbers-focused processes… that gather parties’ confidential settlement offers and demands and determine if and what settlement the parties should mutually accept…articles and reports have provided more facial discussion of ODR’s inevitability with the rise of e-communities and the Internet-savvy generation...[i]

Despite the lack of scholarly attention devoted to ODR, the vast amount of scattered information available and relatively widespread use of the process merit an in-depth look at this emerging technology.

The next post will go more in depth into what online dispute resolution is. Stay tuned!


[i] Amy J. Schmitz, Drive-thru Arbitration in the Digital Age: Empowering Consumers through Binding ODR, 62 Baylor L. Rev. 178, 182-183(2010).; Leah Wing & Daniel Rainey, Online Dispute Resolution and the Development of Theory, in ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION: THEORY AND PRACTICE: A TREATISE ON TECHNOLOGY AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION, 25 (Daniel Rainey, Ethan Katsh, & Mohamed S. Abdel Wahab eds., The Hauge: Eleven International, 2012).

Related Posts

  • Online Dispute Resolution:  An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part IIOnline Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part II
  • Online Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part IVOnline Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part IV
  • Fairness, Trust, and Security in Online Dispute ResolutionFairness, Trust, and Security in Online Dispute Resolution
  •  Online Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part V Online Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part V
  • Online Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part IIIOnline Dispute Resolution: An Amorphous Concept, Yet An Effective Tool Part III
  • Digital Disagreements: Neural Networks and Their PotentialDigital Disagreements: Neural Networks and Their Potential

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Renee Kolar

Renée Kolar received her J.D. from the University of Texas School of Law in December 2012 and passed the February 2013 Texas Bar Exam. Her experience living abroad and studying translation taught her that misunderstandings between people arise not just from their language differences, but also from the absence of a shared cultural background.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy