• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (312) 705-9317

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Dangers of Digitizing Due Process

0
by Beth Graham

Tuesday, Feb 18, 2020


Tweet

Amy J. Schmitz, Elwood L. Thomas Missouri Endowed Professor of Law at the University of Missouri School of Law, has written “Dangers of Digitizing Due Process,” University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2020-01 (Draft to be Edited and Included in Published Proceedings with Cyberjustice Laboratory).  In her research article, Professor Schmitz examines potential concerns related to the increasing role of technology in the dispute resolution process.

Here is the abstract:

Technology has become the “fourth party” in dispute resolution through the growing field of online dispute resolution (ODR), which includes use of technology and computer-mediated-communication (CMC) in negotiation, mediation, arbitration and other dispute resolution processes. At the same time, courts are now moving processes online and using technologies such as predictive analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) for setting bail and other judicial tasks. Furthermore, such e-court and other judicial uses of technology are flourishing due to their proclivity for furthering austerity goals while expanding access to remedies. Nonetheless, there is danger that the rush to digitization will ignore due process and transparency in the name of efficiency. Accordingly, this paper will provide brief background on the growth of e-courts and raise concerns for policymakers to consider for the preservation of fairness in public dispute resolution.

This and other academic works published by Professor Schmitz may be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Network.

Photo by: Mateus Campos Felipe on Unsplash

Related Posts

  • ICC Releases Its New Arbitration RulesICC Releases Its New Arbitration Rules
  • ICC International Commercial Arbitration | Paris, Sept. 24-27, 2012ICC International Commercial Arbitration | Paris, Sept. 24-27, 2012
  • ICC 9th Annual Miami Conference | Nov. 6, 2011ICC 9th Annual Miami Conference | Nov. 6, 2011
  • SEC Seeks Comments on FINRA’s Arbitration Rule ChangeSEC Seeks Comments on FINRA’s Arbitration Rule Change
  • A Fair Fight: Professional Guidelines in International ArbitrationA Fair Fight: Professional Guidelines in International Arbitration
  • Ordering Online Arbitration in the Age of Covid … and BeyondOrdering Online Arbitration in the Age of Covid … and Beyond

Like this article? Share it!


  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2026, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy