• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA’s Successful Arbitration Track Record

0
by Victoria VanBuren

Wednesday, Aug 01, 2012


Tweet

by Renée Kolar

Since its inception, the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) has won 58 out of 60 arbitrations against athletes who have contested the agency’s sanctions. In federal court, USADA has never been beaten.

Justin Gatlin, a sprinter from Florida, enjoyed an ephemeral victory when he was granted a temporary injunction against USADA in June 2008 to lift his suspension for alleged doping so he could participate in the 2008 Olympic Games. The federal court, however, dissolved the injunction four days later because it found it lacked jurisdiction to intervene in USADA’s process. Gatlin v. U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, Inc., 2008 WL 2567657, *1 (N.D.Fla. Jun. 24, 2008).

Despite Gatlin’s brief moment of success, there is a lack of precedent of successful legal challenges to USADA. In 2004, Olympic runner Regina Jacobs sued USADA after it found that she doped. Her lawsuit challenged the rules governing the arbitration procedure, not whether USADA’s procedures were unconstitutional as Lance Armstrong now asserts. Jacobs v. U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, 04 Civ. 1163 (BSJ), 2004 WL 5003951 at *1 (S.D.N.Y May 19, 2004). Nevertheless, a federal court dismissed her lawsuit on grounds it lacked jurisdiction to involve itself in a USADA arbitration. Id. at *4.

Four years later, track coach Trevor Graham was sanctioned for allegedly providing steroids to athletes and he sued USADA on constitutional grounds. A federal court dismissed his lawsuit explaining that the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act gave USADA exclusive jurisdiction. Graham v. USADA, No. 5:10-CV-194-F, 2011 WL 1261321, at *6 (E.D. N.C. 2011)

Only two athletes have won against USADA in independent arbitration proceedings. Cyclist Jonathan Page was charged with a violation in 2008 for failing to submit a sample after a race in Belgium. The arbitration panel found he had “compelling justification” and that no sanction should be imposed because he was sick and suffered a concussion and other injuries in a race-ending crash. USADA v. Jonathan Page, AAA No. 77 190 16 09 JENF.

Sprinter LaTasha Jenkins also succeeded in contesting the agency’s sanctions in 2008. She had tested positive for an anabolic steroid metabolite. The arbitration panel found that her doping samples had been mishandled in the lab in contravention of the International Standards for Laboratories (ISL) and the results should therefore be set aside. USADA v. LaTasha Jenkins, AAA No. 30 190 00199 07.

Related Posts:

  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part VI | Right to Appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), Disputing, July 30, 2012
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part V |USADA Expedited Track, Disputing, July 26, 2012
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part IV | The Arbitration Hearing, Disputing, July 25, 2012
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part III | The Appointment of Arbitrators, Disputing, July 24, 2012
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part II | The Review Board Track, Disputing, July 23, 2012
  • Armstrong v. Tygart | USADA Files Motion to Dismiss Lance Armstrong’s Suit , Disputing, July 21, 2012
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part I | USADA ‘Results Management,’ Disputing, July 19, 2012
  • Armstrong v. Tygart | Texas Federal Court Will Hear Lance Armstrong Case on August 10, Disputing, July 18, 2012
  • Armstrong v. Tygart | Lance Armstrong’s Suit and Restraining Order against USADA, Disputing, July 17, 2012
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | What is the USADA? Disputing, July 16, 2012
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Allegations, Disputing, July 13, 2012
  • Lance Armstrong | The Doping Controversy Continues, Disputing, July 12, 2012

Renée Kolar is a summer intern at Karl Bayer, Dispute Resolution Expert . Renée is a J.D. candidate at The University of Texas School of Law and holds an undergraduate degree in Applied Foreign Languages from l’Université Stendhal in Grenoble, France.

 

Related Posts

  • 2012 Year-End Highlights | USADA Case against Lance Armstrong2012 Year-End Highlights | USADA Case against Lance Armstrong
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | Statute of LimitationsUSADA Case against Lance Armstrong | Statute of Limitations
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | Evidence against ArmstrongUSADA Case against Lance Armstrong | Evidence against Armstrong
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | Standard of Proof and Means of ProofUSADA Case against Lance Armstrong | Standard of Proof and Means of Proof
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | Charges Brought against ArmstrongUSADA Case against Lance Armstrong | Charges Brought against Armstrong
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong |  USADA Issues its Reasoned Opinion Describing its Evidence against Lance ArmstrongUSADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Issues its Reasoned Opinion Describing its Evidence against Lance Armstrong

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Victoria VanBuren

Born and raised in Mexico, Victoria is a native Spanish speaker and a graduate of the Monterrey Institute of Technology (Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey), or "the MIT of Latin America." She concentrated in physics and mathematics. Immediately after completing her work at the Institute, Victoria moved to Canada to study English and French. On her way back to Mexico, she landed in Dallas and managed to have her luggage lost at the airport. Charmed by the Texas hospitality, she decided to stay and made her way back to Austin, which she's adopted as home.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy