• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (312) 705-9317

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part I | USADA ‘Results Management’

0
by Victoria VanBuren

Thursday, Jul 19, 2012


Tweet

by Renée Kolar

USADA’s adjudication process relies on an American Arbitration Association (AAA)/Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) arbitrated hearing under the modified AAA Commercial Rules. For a complete listing of USADA protocol and policy documents, visit the Resources section of the USADA website.

The first step towards the USADA adjudication process occurs when a laboratory reports an Adverse Analytical Finding on an A Sample for a Prohibited Substance (See World Anti-Doping Code for a list of prohibited substances). USADA will then notify the Athlete or other Person that they have three days in which to accept a Provisional Suspension. USADA may for good cause shorten the period by two days or lengthen it by four. United States Anti-Doping Agency, Protocol for Olympic and Paralympic Movement Testing § 11 (2009) [hereinafter USADA Protocol].

If the Athlete or other Person accepts a Provisional Suspension the Athlete’s case will proceed on the Anti-Doping Review Board Track. Id. at § 12. If the Athlete does not accept the Provisional Suspension proposed by USADA by the deadline and if an involuntary Provisional Suspension is not imposed, the Athlete’s case will proceed on the Expedited Track. Id.

Related Posts:

  • Armstrong v. Tygart | Texas Federal Court Will Hear Lance Armstrong Case on August 10, Disputing, July 18, 2012
  • Armstrong v. Tygart | Lance Armstrong’s Suit and Restraining Order against USADA, Disputing, July 17, 2012
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | What is the USADA? Disputing, July 16, 2012
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Allegations, Disputing, July 13, 2012
  • Lance Armstrong | The Doping Controversy Continues, Disputing, July 12, 2012

Renée Kolar is a summer intern at Karl Bayer, Dispute Resolution Expert . Renée is a J.D. candidate at The University of Texas School of Law and holds an undergraduate degree in Applied Foreign Languages from l’Université Stendhal in Grenoble, France.

 

Related Posts

  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part V | USADA Expedited TrackUSADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part V | USADA Expedited Track
  • 2012 Year-End Highlights | USADA Case against Lance Armstrong2012 Year-End Highlights | USADA Case against Lance Armstrong
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | Remaining Procedural StepsUSADA Case against Lance Armstrong | Remaining Procedural Steps
  • Armstrong v. Tygart | Federal Court to Rule Before August 23Armstrong v. Tygart | Federal Court to Rule Before August 23
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part VI | Right to Appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part VI | Right to Appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
  • UCI Recognizes Sanctions against Lance ArmstrongUCI Recognizes Sanctions against Lance Armstrong

Like this article? Share it!


  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Victoria VanBuren

Born and raised in Mexico, Victoria is a native Spanish speaker and a graduate of the Monterrey Institute of Technology (Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey), or "the MIT of Latin America." She concentrated in physics and mathematics. Immediately after completing her work at the Institute, Victoria moved to Canada to study English and French. On her way back to Mexico, she landed in Dallas and managed to have her luggage lost at the airport. Charmed by the Texas hospitality, she decided to stay and made her way back to Austin, which she's adopted as home.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2026, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy