• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


US MSHA Unveils Pilot Mediation Program

0
by Victoria VanBuren

Thursday, Aug 26, 2010


Tweet

Platts reports that the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) just launched a pilot mediation program. Here are the details:

Washington (Platts)–20Aug2010/540 pm EDT/2140 GMT

US mine safety regulators plan to revert to a speedier mediation process during a 90-day test period starting later this month in an effort to reduce the number of citations appealed by operators.

The Mine Safety and Health Administration said Friday it plans to alter “safety and health conferences” so that mine operators can informally dispute citations before filing a formal appeal with the agency’s administrative review board.

The pilot program will be tested starting August 31 at a pair of eastern coal mine district offices and one metal/non-metal office.

The agency is considering reinstituting a conferencing system that was eliminated in 2007 partly in response to criticism that too many citations were being thrown out in a manner too friendly to the industry.

A possible return and revision of the conferencing system represents a rare area of agreement between the Obama administration and the mining industry, which praised the plan.

“We were pleased to hear that MSHA is considering revising its current safety conference procedure,” Tony Bumbico, vice president of safety for Arch Coal, said through a spokeswoman. “If approached objectively by all parties, the new conference guidelines have the potential to resolve legitimate disputes early in the process which would be to everyone’s benefit.”

The National Mining Association, which has been pushing for a return to the old conferencing system, also lauded the plan.

MSHA is seeking ways to reduce a backlog of 89,000 cases before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, which a subject of congressional scrutiny both before and after April’s deadly Upper Big Branch blast. The death of 29 workers in the accident only added to the scrutiny.

According to FMSHRC data, the number of cases filed during the 12 months ending October 1, 2008 more than doubled from the previous year to 8,900. The commission is on pace to set another record this year, with more than 9,100 cases filed through August 14, compared with 9,200 for the entire fiscal 2009.

“It is clear that the current conferencing structure is not working,” MSHA Administrator Joe Main said in a statement. “By resolving factual disputes before a violation is contested, these citations will not be added to the enormous backlog of cases that have bogged down the judicial system.”

The United Mine Workers of America and other safety advocates were leery of the program and its potential for departing from a multi-step process put in place last year.

“If it’s exactly the same way as it was before — and that’s not clear — then that represents a step backward,” said union spokesman Phil Smith. “We don’t see it as making any progress, because the way it was before…gave the operators too many bites of the apple.” The new pilot program will allow both mine operators and miner representatives to participate in the conferences. Main said he hoped the program will make the agency’s enforcement more efficient.

The program will start at three district offices: Coal District 2 in Mt. Pleasant, Pennsylvania; Coal District 6 in Pikeville, Kentucky, and the Metal/Nonmetal Southeast District in Birmingham, Alabama.

–Peter Gartrell, peter_gartrell@platts.com

Related Posts

  • ALI-ABA Webinar | AT&T Mobility v Concepcion – What It Means for Class Actions and Arbitration, June 1, 2011ALI-ABA Webinar | AT&T Mobility v Concepcion – What It Means for Class Actions and Arbitration, June 1, 2011
  • International Arbitration in Latin America| Webcast on May 4th, 2011International Arbitration in Latin America| Webcast on May 4th, 2011
  • Disputing’s 4-Year AnniversaryDisputing’s 4-Year Anniversary
  • Fifth Circuit Lacks Jurisdiction Over Order Compelling Arbitration in Movant’s Non-Preferred ForumFifth Circuit Lacks Jurisdiction Over Order Compelling Arbitration in Movant’s Non-Preferred Forum
  • Federal Judge Refuses to Enforce AT&T’s Arbitration Policy Against Former EmployeeFederal Judge Refuses to Enforce AT&T’s Arbitration Policy Against Former Employee
  • The Future of Class Arbitration Part IIThe Future of Class Arbitration Part II

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Victoria VanBuren

Born and raised in Mexico, Victoria is a native Spanish speaker and a graduate of the Monterrey Institute of Technology (Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey), or "the MIT of Latin America." She concentrated in physics and mathematics. Immediately after completing her work at the Institute, Victoria moved to Canada to study English and French. On her way back to Mexico, she landed in Dallas and managed to have her luggage lost at the airport. Charmed by the Texas hospitality, she decided to stay and made her way back to Austin, which she's adopted as home.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy