• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


UNCITRAL Revises International Arbitration Rules

0
by Beth Graham

Wednesday, Dec 08, 2010


Tweet

After 34 years, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) has revised its International Arbitration Rules. The revised Rules seek to expedite the arbitration process and account for changes in technology since the Rules were originally adopted in 1976. According to Ben Allen and Adam Hunter of Norton Rose LLP’s Sydney Office, the following changes apply to international arbitration agreements that took effect after August 15, 2010:

  • Parties no longer have to agree in writing that the UNCITRAL rules will apply to the arbitration. Any record that displays an agreement to be bound by the Rules is sufficient (Article 1).
  • The Notice of Arbitration may now be transmitted electronically; arguments that address sufficiency of notice will no longer hinder the constitution of the tribunal (Articles 2 & 3).
  • Parties waive the right to bring any claim against the arbitrators and the appointing authority based on any act or omission in connection with the arbitration (other than intentional wrongdoing) (Article 16).
  • Third parties may now be joined to the proceedings and claims made against them in response to the Notice of Arbitration (Article 17).
  • New interim measures outline the Tribunal’s power to require the applicant to provide security, to alter or terminate the interim measure imposed and use costs and damages awards to prevent or compensate for abuse of the procedure (Article 26).
  • The revised Rules introduce the right to external review and correction of arbitrators’ fees (Article 41).

The revised Rules do not govern confidentiality. You may read more about the revisions here and here.

Disputing previously discussed the new Rules here.

Technorati Tags: law, ADR, arbitration

Related Posts

  • Article | United Nations Commission on International Trade Adopts Revised UNCITRAL Arbitration RulesArticle | United Nations Commission on International Trade Adopts Revised UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules
  • Article | IBA Revises Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International ArbitrationArticle | IBA Revises Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration
  • Special Masters: How To Make the Best of Both Worlds, Part VSpecial Masters: How To Make the Best of Both Worlds, Part V
  • Texas Bar Journal Article: The Future of ArbitrationTexas Bar Journal Article: The Future of Arbitration
  • Mind the Gap: Bringing Technology to the Mediation TableMind the Gap: Bringing Technology to the Mediation Table
  • Digital Accessibility and Disability Accommodations in Online Dispute Resolution: ODR for EveryoneDigital Accessibility and Disability Accommodations in Online Dispute Resolution: ODR for Everyone

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy