• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Uber Drops Mandatory Arbitration Requirement for Sexual Assault Victims

0
by Beth Graham

Friday, May 18, 2018


Tweet

On Tuesday, ride-sharing company Uber formally announced it would no longer require sexual harassment and assault victims to arbitrate their claims against the company.  Prior to the company’s public announcement, all such claims were subject to confidential and mandatory arbitration.

According to the announcement that was issued by Uber’s Chief Legal Officer, Tony West, titled “Turning the lights on,” Uber is making three specific changes aimed at improving the company’s safety processes:

First, we will no longer require mandatory arbitration for individual claims of sexual assault or sexual harassment by Uber riders, drivers or employees.

…

Second, survivors will now have the option to settle their claims with Uber without a confidentiality provision that prevents them from speaking about the facts of the sexual assault or sexual harassment they suffered.

…

Third, we commit to publishing a safety transparency report that will include data on sexual assaults and other incidents that occur on the Uber platform.

The new policy was reportedly rolled out in response to an April 26th open letter to Uber’s Board of Directors that was signed by more than a dozen women who claim they were sexually harassed or assaulted by an Uber driver between October 2016 and March 2018.  In March, an attorney for many of the women who wrote the open letter reportedly filed a proposed class action lawsuit against Uber “seeking to remove the arbitration requirement and compel Uber to adopt safety measures, including fingerprinting all its drivers” in the Northern District of California.

This is not the first time in recent months a company has removed its arbitration requirement for sexual assault and harassment victims.  In December, Washington-based Microsoft Corporation immediately waived its “contractual requirement for arbitration of sexual harassment claims in our own arbitration agreements for the limited number of employees who have this requirement.”  You may read more about Microsoft’s new policy in a prior Disputing blog post.

Photo credit:  volker-kannacher on Foter.com / CC BY-ND

Related Posts

  • Federal Court Sends Data Privacy Dispute to ArbitrationFederal Court Sends Data Privacy Dispute to Arbitration
  • Potential Class Action Privacy Case Against Facebook Heads to MediationPotential Class Action Privacy Case Against Facebook Heads to Mediation
  • N. D. of Texas Refuses to Grant Nonsignatory Samsung’s Motion to Compel Arbitration in Mobile Phone LitigationN. D. of Texas Refuses to Grant Nonsignatory Samsung’s Motion to Compel Arbitration in Mobile Phone Litigation
  • ND Texas Compels Would-Be FLSA Class Action to ArbitrationND Texas Compels Would-Be FLSA Class Action to Arbitration
  • N.D. of Texas Lifts TRO Enjoining FINRA ArbitrationsN.D. of Texas Lifts TRO Enjoining FINRA Arbitrations
  • Texas Federal Court Finds Blockbuster’s Online User Agreement ‘Illusory’ and Denies Motion to Compel ArbitrationTexas Federal Court Finds Blockbuster’s Online User Agreement ‘Illusory’ and Denies Motion to Compel Arbitration

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy