On November 14, 2011 the U.S. Supreme Court remanded Branch Banking and Trust v. Gordon for the Eleventh Circuit to reconsider its decision in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U. S. ___ (2011).
In Gordon v. Branch Banking & Trust, 419 Fed. Appx. 920 (11th Cir. Fla. 2011) the Eleventh Circuit had ruled that an arbitration provision in a consumer checking account agreement was unenforceable because the arbitration provision’s non-severable waiver of the right to a class action was substantively unconscionable under Georgia law.
Stay tuned.
Technorati Tags:
Related Posts
2011 Arbitration Case Law | U.S. Supreme Court
Class Arbitration on the Ropes Again- U.S. Supreme Court Vacates Class Arbitration Decision | Fensterstock v. Education Finance Partners
AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion | Blawgosphere Round-up on Class Arbitration Decision 
GUEST-POST | Possible Outcomes for Class Arbitration Waivers in Consumer Contracts 
DirecTV Asks 11th Circuit to Send Customer’s STELA Data Privacy Claims to Arbitration
