• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

0
by Julie Jordan

Wednesday, May 27, 2020


Tweet

Good court reporters have seen and worked through every scenario – mumblers, whisperers, screamers, paper rattlers, cross-talkers – you name it. So, after 32 years, I thought I’d seen it all. And then came COVID-19.

What to do? Wait for things to get back to normal or find a way to serve my clients who wanted to move forward? I decided to investigate and discovered Zoom couldn’t be easier to use. It provides the most “real” experience of the video conferencing and software programs I’ve seen.

Better than live depositions, I can consistently and clearly see the face of the witness, as well as the exhibits on-screen as they’re being read. We’re able to record video of all speakers or the traditional witness-only view. There’s no travel, no wasting time and I’m able to produce the same great product as in a live deposition.

So, I was ready. All I had to do was wait for and encourage my clients to give it a shot. And eventually some of you did. Here are the best practices we’ve discovered together.

Do a Trial Run

Most reporters offer you the opportunity to do a trial run. Take them up on this. It gives you a chance to learn the technology in a stress-free environment. You’ll see how exhibits are posted, who can see what and just how visible the witness is. You’ll learn to toggle from gallery to speaker view – and most importantly, you’ll see how obvious it is if someone is trying to listen to or read something other than what’s being presented. In other words, how difficult it is to cheat.

Label and organize your exhibits ahead of the deposition

Exhibits are easy to share – even if you’re trying to surprise the witness. To keep your momentum and pace, consider organizing your exhibits, labeling them 1-100 and sharing them prior to the deposition with counsel and your reporter. This allows you to reference exhibits by number and keep moving. If surprise is part of your strategy, you can add and share those specific documents during the deposition.

Invest in quality internet and hardwire to your router

Our whole lives are wireless these days. Depositions are the time to plug back in. To ensure the best sound and video quality, I recommend attorneys and witnesses hardwire to their routers and use the computer audio on Zoom (with phone audio as back-up). You’ll see mixed opinions on this, especially from the early weeks of remote depositions. However, trial and error has shown me that computer audio produces the best record and video without interference or a lag. What you don’t want are witnesses roaming around the backyard on sketchy cell service. Believe me, it’s happened.

Avoid unseen influence

Attorneys fret about counsel coaching witnesses or texting them during remote depositions. Before we begin, I ask all parties if anyone is in the room with them or listening in that I can’t see on the screen. This, at least, puts it on the record that the witness is alone and not being coached. Doubters worry witnesses can receive texts or chats. My office disables the private chat feature, so chats are visible to all. Zoom records chats, so they’re part of the recording. You can see the witness (and their body posture) clear as day. They’re also on the record and you can easily ask them directly again, if something seems out of sorts.

Spend the money on a videographer

If this is the type of case you would usually video, be sure to do so on a Zoom deposition. The videographer is recording everything – each individual participant, the speaker, the court reporter, the onscreen exhibits – and it’s all stored in the cloud and can be synced to the transcript. Zoom video doesn’t do that.

Don’t wait for the old “normal”

The country is divided on so many issues, including remote depositions. Many attorneys are hoping live depositions will return soon…and they may. But that doesn’t mean court reporters are eager (or willing) to appear live. The thought of being in a small conference room with everyone wearing masks (or worse, not wearing masks) will keep a lot of reporters away. Prior to COVID-19, Texas was experiencing a court reporter shortage, making it harder for firms to cover your depositions. This pandemic will make that worse. Waiting for the restrictions to lift will put more stress on the shortage and delay depositions even more.

These are just a few of the tips I’ve learned over the past two months. There are many more and I’m happy to share and help you get up to speed. Who knows what our future holds? Several months ago, I certainly didn’t think it was this. But there is a way forward.

Photo by: Bill Oxford on Unsplash

Related Posts

  • Lessons from Mediators’ StoriesLessons from Mediators’ Stories
  • Fifth Circuit Vacates Northern District of Texas Order Compelling ArbitrationFifth Circuit Vacates Northern District of Texas Order Compelling Arbitration
  • Disputing Welcomes the ‘Caucus On Mediation’ Blog Disputing Welcomes the ‘Caucus On Mediation’ Blog
  • Fifth Circuit Affirms W.D. of Texas Order Confirming Arbitrator’s Modified DecisionFifth Circuit Affirms W.D. of Texas Order Confirming Arbitrator’s Modified Decision
  • U.S. Supreme Court Grants Certiorari to Consumer Arbitration CaseU.S. Supreme Court Grants Certiorari to Consumer Arbitration Case
  • Second Circuit Remands Fensterstock v. Education Finance Partners Second Circuit Remands Fensterstock v. Education Finance Partners

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Julie Jordan

Julie Jordan has been a court reporter for 32 years and has owned her court reporting business since January 1998. She was introduced to court reporting in college when she accompanied her mom to a deposition. Intrigued by the woman in the corner with the funny typewriter, she enrolled in court reporting school. Only 10% of students finish reporting school and fewer than that pass the state exams. Julie did both and has been taking accurate records ever since. Certified in Texas and Colorado, Julie provides reporting and video services for local, state and national law firms. An early adopter of technology, Julie is passionate about leveraging best-in-industry tools for depositions and was one of the first court reporters to master and offer remote depositions during COVID-19. An avid fly-fisher and cook, Julie enjoys spending time in Colorado, the kitchen or a mountain stream.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy