• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Thursday, October 6, 2005

0
by Rob Hargrove

Thursday, Oct 06, 2005


Tweet

This morning, the Third Court of Appeals issued three memorandum opinions. The first concerns a juvenile adjudication for the offense of assault, and the second affirms a decision by the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners to revoke a physician’s license to practice medicine in Texas. Cause Nos. 03-04-00001-CV and 03-04-00612-CV, respectively.

The Court’s third memorandum opinion, in an interlocutory appeal, reverses a Trial Court’s decision to deny a non-Texan defendant’s special appearance, holding that the Defendant in question, a Kansas corporation, did not have adequate contacts with the State of Texas to establish specific personal jurisdiction, even though the corporation in question contributed $25,000.00 to the Texans for a Republican Majority Political Action committee (“TRMPAC”). According to the Court, the contribution was made so the Defendant could lobby Tom DeLay, a U.S. Congressman, to influence the outcome of a federal energy bill pending before the U.S. Congress:

By all accounts, Westar’s only motivation in writing the $25,000 check to TRMPAC was to influence federal legislation by meeting with a federal congressman, who is afforded no vote in the Texas legislature. Even considering that DeLay may have a voice in Texas politics, the appellees did not allege or offer any evidence to show that Westar sought to influence the outcome of any Texas election or Texas legislation. For the purpose that Westar sought DeLay’s audience – to gain support for Westar’s position on federal legislation – DeLay could have represented any of the fifty states. And DeLay’s Texas residency is not dispositive of the issue because a nonresident defendant does not establish minimum contacts with Texas simply by interacting with one of its residents outside of Texas, in a manner that is unrelated to any activities within the state. Instead, the jurisdictional inquiry focuses on what contacts the defendant has purposefully established with the forum, so as to enjoy the benefits and protections of its laws.

(emphasis in original)

Cause No. 03-05-00276-CV, Westar Energy, Inc. v. James Sylvester, Ken Yarborough and Josephine Miller

Related Posts

  • Special Exceptions Procedure in TexasSpecial Exceptions Procedure in Texas
  • Recalcitrant Registered AgentsRecalcitrant Registered Agents
  • Thursday, December 1, 2005Thursday, December 1, 2005
  • Thursday, October 20, 2005Thursday, October 20, 2005
  • Wednesday, September 14, 2005Wednesday, September 14, 2005
  • Wednesday, August 31, 2005Wednesday, August 31, 2005

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy