• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Allegations

0
by Victoria VanBuren

Friday, Jul 13, 2012


Tweet

On June 12, 2012, the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) notified cyclist Lance Armstrong and other members of the USPS team of its opening of a formal action alleging violations under the (i) Union Cycliste International (UCI) Anti-Doping Rules, (ii) World Anti-Doping Code, and (iii) USADA Protocol for Olympic and Paralympic Movement Testing. (read the Notification here)

USADA Allegations

Specifically, USADA alleges that evidence in their possession “reflects a pervasive pattern of doping.” The Notification cites the following substances and methods:

  • Erythropoitien (EPO). Used to increase the number of red blood cells.
  • Blood Transfusions. Involve extraction of athlete’s own blood and re-infusion of that blood shortly before or during competition.
  • Testosterone. Used to increase muscle mass and strength.
  • Human Growth Hormone (hGH). Used to increase strength and lean muscle mass.
  • Corticosteroids. Used to reduce inflammation and assist in recovery.
  • Saline and Plasma Infusions. To prevent detection of EPO use or blood transfusions.

The Notification alleges that Armstrong committed the following anti-doping violations with respect to the substances/methods above: use and/or attempted use, possession, trafficking, administration and/or attempted administration, assisting, encouraging, aiding, abetting, covering up, and other complicity, and aggravating circumstances.

USADA gave the respondents until June 22, 2012 to make a written submission before the Anti-Doping Review Board and clarified that the function of the Review Board is to recommend whether there is sufficient evidence of doping to proceed with the adjudication process. On June 29, the three-person Review Board made a unanimous recommendation to move forward with Armstrong’s adjudication process.

Armstrong Doctors Banned for Anti-Doping Violations

On July 10, USADA announced that Dr. Luis Garcia del Moral (cycling team doctor), Dr. Michele Ferrari (cycling team consulting doctor) and Jose “Pepe” Martí (cycling team trainer) have all received lifetime periods of ineligibility as the result of their anti-doping rule violations in the United States Postal Service (USPS) Cycling Team Doping Conspiracy. (read the announcement here)

[UPDATE]: According to the Washington Post, on July 13, USADA confirmed that Armstrong’s coach Johan Bruyneel elected to contest his case in arbitration. (read more here)

Deadline Extension

On July 11, USADA granted Armstrong an extension of up to 30 days (the original deadline was July 14) to contest drug charges while the he challenges the case in federal court. If Armstrong doesn’t respond to doping charges before USADA prior to the end of the extension period and ask for an arbitration hearing to face the allegations, a lifetime ban from sports might go into place and he could face the loss of his Tour de France titles.

Stay tuned!

Related Posts:

  • Lance Armstrong | The Doping Controversy Continues, Disputing, July 12, 2012

Related Posts

  • Lance Armstrong | The Doping Controversy ContinuesLance Armstrong | The Doping Controversy Continues
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | Charges Brought against ArmstrongUSADA Case against Lance Armstrong | Charges Brought against Armstrong
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Announces Lance Armstrong’s Lifetime Ban from Sport and Forfeiture of TitlesUSADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Announces Lance Armstrong’s Lifetime Ban from Sport and Forfeiture of Titles
  • Arbitration Panel to Reconsider Binding Agreement Between Armstrong and SCA PromotionsArbitration Panel to Reconsider Binding Agreement Between Armstrong and SCA Promotions
  • Top 10 Disputing Posts of 2012Top 10 Disputing Posts of 2012
  • 2012 Year-End Highlights | USADA Case against Lance Armstrong2012 Year-End Highlights | USADA Case against Lance Armstrong

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Victoria VanBuren

Born and raised in Mexico, Victoria is a native Spanish speaker and a graduate of the Monterrey Institute of Technology (Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey), or "the MIT of Latin America." She concentrated in physics and mathematics. Immediately after completing her work at the Institute, Victoria moved to Canada to study English and French. On her way back to Mexico, she landed in Dallas and managed to have her luggage lost at the airport. Charmed by the Texas hospitality, she decided to stay and made her way back to Austin, which she's adopted as home.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy