• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


The Special Nature of International Insurance and Reinsurance Arbitration

0
by Beth Graham

Monday, Nov 16, 2015


Tweet

S.I. Strong, Manley O. Hudson Professor of Law at the University of Missouri School of Law and Senior Fellow at the Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution, has written “The Special Nature of International Insurance and Reinsurance Arbitration: A Response to Professor Jerry,” 2015 Journal of Dispute Resolution, Forthcoming; University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015-21. In her scholarly article, Professor Strong expands on the policy and legal issues associated with international insurance and reinsurance arbitration.

Here is the abstract:

In his article, “Dispute Resolution, Insurance, and Points of Convergence,” Professor Jerry describes the numerous ways that insurance law intersects with dispute resolution. Through that discussion, Professor Jerry identifies the special nature of insurance disputes and challenges experts in both fields to work together to address the various legal and policy issues that exist in this area of law. This Response takes up that call with respect to one particularly intriguing field of inquiry: international insurance and reinsurance arbitration.

The focus of the current discussion is to illustrate the complexity of international insurance arbitration by describing some of the legal tensions that arise in this particular field. Three key conflicts exist. The first involves the interaction between international law and U.S. constitutional law. This issue arises as a result of the debate about the extent to which the McCarran-Ferguson Act reverse preempts certain legal principles in international disputes. The second type of conflict involves the tension between U.S. and foreign law. This discussion is placed in the context of Bermuda Form arbitration, although the points are equally applicable to other types of international insurance arbitration. The third and final type of conflict arises at the policy level. Here, the tension involves the pro-arbitration policy exhibited by the United States and other countries in matters involving international commercial disputes and the principle of state regulation to promote the public interest in insurance law. Inherent in this discussion is the question of whether private parties should be able to exercise their personal autonomy to create dispute resolution mechanisms that may subvert or conflict with certain public values.

Although the current analysis is intended to be introductory rather than comprehensive, the discussion nevertheless seeks to demonstrate the diversity and depth of legal and policy issues associated with international insurance and reinsurance arbitration. In so doing, this Response hopes to provide experts in both insurance law and dispute resolution with new insights about this particular procedure while also inspiring further work in this area.

A link to the article referenced by Professor Strong is available in an earlier Disputing blog post.  Additionally, many of Professor Strong’s research papers may be downloaded free of charge from the Social Science Research Network.

Photo credit: free pictures of money / Foter.com / CC BY

Related Posts

  • Past As Prologue: Arbitration as an Early Common Law CourtPast As Prologue: Arbitration as an Early Common Law Court
  • Anti-Suit Injunctions in Judicial and Arbitral Procedures in the United StatesAnti-Suit Injunctions in Judicial and Arbitral Procedures in the United States
  • Realizing Rationality: An Empirical Assessment of International Commercial MediationRealizing Rationality: An Empirical Assessment of International Commercial Mediation
  • Use and Perception of International Commercial Mediation and ConciliationUse and Perception of International Commercial Mediation and Conciliation
  • International Arbitration and Discovery Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1782International Arbitration and Discovery Under 28 U.S.C. Section 1782
  • Article | From Class to Collective: The De-Americanization of Class Arbitration Article | From Class to Collective: The De-Americanization of Class Arbitration

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy