• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


The Court of Arbitration for Sport’s ruling in 2008 allowed Oscar Pistorius to achieve his dream in 2012

0
by Victoria VanBuren

Monday, Aug 06, 2012


Tweet

by Renée Kolar

Oscar Pistorius made history Saturday by becoming the first double-amputee to compete in the able-bodied Olympics. Pistorius is a South African sprinter who was born without a fibula in either leg, and had both legs amputated when he was only 11 months old. To participate in sporting activities, Pistorius uses two high-performance carbon-fiber prosthetics, known as the Cheetah Flex-Foot.

Controversy regarding Mr. Pistorius’ use of these prosthetics arose in 2007, after he won second place in an international competition for abled-bodied athletes. Shortly after that race, the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) decided to introduce an amendment to the IAAF competition Rule 144.2. The amendment banned the “(e) Use of any technical device that incorporates springs, wheels or any other element that provides the user with an advantage over another athlete not using such a device.” After the adoption of this amendment, Mr. Pistorius’ track performances were monitored and tests were conducted to determine whether the Cheetah Flex-Foot gave Mr. Pistorius advantages over athletes without prosthetic limbs. Based on the results of those studies, on 14 January 2008, the IAAF ruled him ineligible for competitions conducted under its rules, including the 2008 Summer Olympics.

Mr. Pistorius appealed to the Court of Arbitration (CAS) for Sport in February 2008. The CAS Panel considered the following issues: (1) Was the process leading to the IAAF Decision procedurally unsound? (2) Was the IAAF Decision unlawfully discriminatory? (3) Was the IAAF Decision wrong in determining that Mr. Pistorius’ use of the Cheetah Flex-Foot device contravenes IAAF Rule 144.2(e)? Ultimately, the Panel held overall there was no evidence that Pistorius had any net advantage over able-bodied athletes and revoked the IAAF decision. (Read the CAS opinion here)

Pistorius was therefore eligible to compete in the Beijing 2008 Olympics, but failed to qualify for the South African team. This time around, however, Pistorius qualified for the 2012 Summer Olympics in March and Saturday achieved his dream of making it to the semifinals in the 400-meter sprint. He finished Saturday’s race second in his heat and 16th overall out of 47 runners with a time of 45.44 seconds.


Renée Kolar is a summer intern at Karl Bayer, Dispute Resolution Expert . Renée is a J.D. candidate at The University of Texas School of Law and holds an undergraduate degree in Applied Foreign Languages from l’Université Stendhal in Grenoble, France.

Related Posts

  • The Rules of the CAS Anti-Doping Division and the CAS Ad Hoc Division at the Olympic GamesThe Rules of the CAS Anti-Doping Division and the CAS Ad Hoc Division at the Olympic Games
  • UCI Recognizes Sanctions against Lance ArmstrongUCI Recognizes Sanctions against Lance Armstrong
  • USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | Remaining Procedural StepsUSADA Case against Lance Armstrong | Remaining Procedural Steps
  • Court of Arbitration for Sport Banned Cyclist Contador 2 YearsCourt of Arbitration for Sport Banned Cyclist Contador 2 Years
  • International Arbitration and Cycling | The Straight DopeInternational Arbitration and Cycling | The Straight Dope
  • Court of Arbitration for Sport Overturns Lifetime Olympics Ban for 28 Russian Athletes Accused of DopingCourt of Arbitration for Sport Overturns Lifetime Olympics Ban for 28 Russian Athletes Accused of Doping

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Victoria VanBuren

Born and raised in Mexico, Victoria is a native Spanish speaker and a graduate of the Monterrey Institute of Technology (Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey), or "the MIT of Latin America." She concentrated in physics and mathematics. Immediately after completing her work at the Institute, Victoria moved to Canada to study English and French. On her way back to Mexico, she landed in Dallas and managed to have her luggage lost at the airport. Charmed by the Texas hospitality, she decided to stay and made her way back to Austin, which she's adopted as home.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy