• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Texas Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument Over Possible FAA Preemption in Nursing Home Case

0
by Beth Graham

Wednesday, Oct 15, 2014


Tweet

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court of Texas heard oral argument in Fredricksburg Care Co., L.P. v. Perez, No. 13-0573. In the case, a Texas nursing home sought appellate review after the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio denied its motion to compel arbitration in a wrongful death lawsuit based on the requirements set forth in the Texas Medical Liability Act (“TMLA”). The issue presented in the case is:

The Federal Arbitration Act preempts state laws which restrict arbitration agreements. The McCarran-Ferguson Act protects state insurance regulations from unintended federal law preemption. Is Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, Section 74.451—which restricts arbitration between healthcare providers and patients—an insurance regulation?

According to the nursing home, the dispute was subject to arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act despite that an arbitral agreement the company entered into with the decedent did not meet the requirements of the TMLA. The deceased woman’s family claimed that the Texas law is an insurance statute that is protected from preemption by the McCarran-Ferguson Act.

Oral argument in the case may be viewed online through the TexasBar CLE.

Photo credit: 401(K) 2013 / Foter / CC BY-SA

Related Posts

  • Texas Supreme Court Holds FAA Preempts Texas Law in Nursing Home DisputeTexas Supreme Court Holds FAA Preempts Texas Law in Nursing Home Dispute
  • SCOTUS Overturns Kentucky Supreme Court in Nursing Home Arbitration CaseSCOTUS Overturns Kentucky Supreme Court in Nursing Home Arbitration Case
  • Federally Funded Nursing Homes No Longer Allowed to Require Residents to Sign Binding Arbitration AgreementsFederally Funded Nursing Homes No Longer Allowed to Require Residents to Sign Binding Arbitration Agreements
  • The Federal Arbitration Act and Displacement of Agency RegulationThe Federal Arbitration Act and Displacement of Agency Regulation
  • San Antonio COA Refuses to Compel Nursing Home Negligence Case to ArbitrationSan Antonio COA Refuses to Compel Nursing Home Negligence Case to Arbitration
  • Texas Supreme Court to Hear Interlocutory Appeal of an Arbitral OrderTexas Supreme Court to Hear Interlocutory Appeal of an Arbitral Order

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy