• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Texas Company Files Suit to Recover Bonus from Armstrong

0
by Beth Graham

Friday, Feb 15, 2013


Tweet

A Texas promotions company that paid cycling champion Lance Armstrong bonus payments following his seven Tour de France wins has filed a breach of contract lawsuit in a Dallas district court against the now disgraced sports star. SCA promotions is seeking to recover more than $12 million the company paid to Armstrong in connection with several cycling wins. This case is especially interesting because SCA and Armstrong previously engaged in arbitral proceedings after the company refused to pay the cyclist a bonus for his 2004 win due to purported doping allegations. Following arbitration, SCA reportedly paid the cyclist a bonus and $7.5 million in attorney fees.

SCA Chief Executive Officer Bob Hamman said in light of Armstrong’s recent doping admission, the payments were unearned and improper. He also stated the promotion company’s position is supported by USADA sanctions imposed against Armstrong last summer that include “forfeiture of any medals, titles, winnings, finishes, points and prizes.” A spokesperson for Armstrong disagrees. He claims the case may not be reopened because the parties’ 2006 settlement includes a provision that states, “No party may challenge, appeal or attempt to set aside the arbitration award.”

Stay tuned to Disputing for updates regarding this lawsuit. You can also read more about the case on NPR.

Related Posts

  • Armstrong v. Tygart |  Hearing is TodayArmstrong v. Tygart | Hearing is Today
  • Texas Supreme Court Denies Armstrong’s Writ of Mandamus PetitionTexas Supreme Court Denies Armstrong’s Writ of Mandamus Petition
  • Bicyclist Armstrong Appeals Arbitration Panel’s Decision to Supreme Court of TexasBicyclist Armstrong Appeals Arbitration Panel’s Decision to Supreme Court of Texas
  • Armstrong Lawyers Claim $12 Million Arbitration Case is ClosedArmstrong Lawyers Claim $12 Million Arbitration Case is Closed
  • Armstrong Seeks to Avoid Review of 2006 Arbitration SettlementArmstrong Seeks to Avoid Review of 2006 Arbitration Settlement
  • Arbitration Panel to Reconsider Binding Agreement Between Armstrong and SCA PromotionsArbitration Panel to Reconsider Binding Agreement Between Armstrong and SCA Promotions

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy