• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Texas Bar Journal Article: “What You Always Wanted to Know About Arbitration”

0
by Beth Graham

Wednesday, Sep 08, 2010


Tweet

Texas Bar Journal

September 2010 | Volume 73, 8

This issue features an interesting article entitled “What You Always Wanted to Know About Arbitration” written by Scott D. Marrs and Sean P. Milligan. The article seeks to answer five key arbitration questions recently decided by the courts:

1. Can the parties agree that an arbitration award is appealable?

In Hall Street Associates, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc., No. 06-989, 552 U.S. 576 (2008), the U.S. Supreme Court held that contractual agreements to expand judicial review in arbitrations governed by the Federal Arbitration Act are prohibited and unenforceable, but left open the possibility that state law might provide a basis for expanded review.

2. Under what circumstances does a party waive its right to arbitrate?

The Texas Supreme Court in Perry Homes v. Cull, No. 05-0882, 258 S.W.3d 580 (Tex. 2008), cert. denied 129 S. Ct. 952, utilized a totality of circumstances test when determining whether waiver has occurred. Those factors include: which party invoked arbitration, the length of time the moving party waited prior to invoking arbitration, whether or not the party invoking arbitration was previously aware of the alternative dispute resolution clause, how much activity was related to the merits of the case rather than arbitrability or jurisdiction, the expense and time incurred in litigation, whether or not the moving party had previously opposed arbitration, filed affirmative claims or dispositive motions in the case, whether arbitration would preclude important discovery, whether activity in court would be duplicated in arbitration and the pending trial date, if set.

3. What effect does an unconscionable contract provision within an agreement have on enforceability of the arbitration clause contained therein?

In Security Service Federal Credit Union v. Sanders, No. 04-07-00540-CV, 264 S.W.3d 292 (Tex. App 2008) the Court of Appeals of Texas held that an illegal or unenforceable contract provision can be severed and the remainder of the contract may be enforced if intended by the parties.

4. Do arbitrators have the power to compel discovery from non-parties?

Although the Second Circuit has stated arbitrators may order a non-party to an arbitration to produce documents so long as that person is called as a witness at the hearing, recent case law has adopted a limited view of an arbitrator’s power to compel discovery from non-parties.

5. Are heirs and beneficiaries bound by a decedent’s arbitration agreement?

In the majority of states, including Texas, the answer to this question depends on whether the wrongful death action is an independent or derivative cause of action under state law. In such states, beneficiaries are bound by a decedent’s agreement to arbitrate in a derivative action.

You can read the full article here.

Technorati Tags:
ADR, law, arbitration

Related Posts

  • Texas Supreme Court Declines to Follow Hall Street in Arbitration Case: Nafta Traders, Inc. v.  QuinnTexas Supreme Court Declines to Follow Hall Street in Arbitration Case: Nafta Traders, Inc. v. Quinn
  • American Review of International Arbitration | Arbitral Power and the Limits of Contract: The New TrilogyAmerican Review of International Arbitration | Arbitral Power and the Limits of Contract: The New Trilogy
  • Law Review Article | Alternative Dispute ResolutionLaw Review Article | Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Fifth Circuit Affirms Vacatur of Arbitration Award Where Intent to Arbitrate Was Not Clear and UnmistakableFifth Circuit Affirms Vacatur of Arbitration Award Where Intent to Arbitrate Was Not Clear and Unmistakable
  • Dallas COA Orders Custom Home Dispute to ArbitrationDallas COA Orders Custom Home Dispute to Arbitration
  • Texas’ 4th COA Compels Arbitration After Two Years of Discovery Where Party Fails to Offer Evidence of PrejudiceTexas’ 4th COA Compels Arbitration After Two Years of Discovery Where Party Fails to Offer Evidence of Prejudice

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy