• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


All articles tagged '"U.S. Supreme Court"'

70 articles found

U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Arguments in Arbitration Unconscionability Case: Rent-A-Center v. Jackson

By Victoria VanBuren - April 22, 2010
Oral arguments in Rent-A-Center West v. Jackson, a case that we have been following on this blog, are scheduled at the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday, April 26. Here are some relevant details: Question Presented: Is the district court required in all cases to determine claims that an arbitration agreement subject to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) is unconscionable, even when the parties to the contract have clearly and unmistakably

Continue reading...

Arbitration Unconscionability Case: New Amicus Curiae Brief

By Victoria VanBuren - April 6, 2010
On March 31, a new amicus brief has been filed with the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Rent-A-Center, West v. Jackson, Docket No. 09-497 (read our previous post here). The case is scheduled to be argued on April 26. The new brief filed by professional arbitrators and arbitration scholars in support of the respondent, argues that the question of whether an arbitration agreement is unconscionable should be decided by a court, not an arbitrator. Lin

Continue reading...

Recent Developments in Arbitration Unconscionability

By Victoria VanBuren - March 30, 2010
As the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to decide Rent-A-Center v. Jackson, we thought that you might find interesting to read the following blog posts and articles relating to the issue of arbitration unconscionability: Who gets to Decide Unconscionability?, Andrea Schneider, ADR Prof Blog (March 4, 2010) Thankful for Unanswered Prayers? Unconscionability Equilibrium, Don Philbin, Alternative Resolutions Newsletter, page 30 (Winter 2010) Unconscionab

Continue reading...

Jones v. Halliburton: Halliburton and KBR Withdraw U.S. Supreme Court Appeal

By Victoria VanBuren - March 24, 2010
The Houston Chronicle reports on Halliburton and KBR’s appeal of the recent Fifth Circuit decision in Jones v. Halliburton, 583 F.3d 228 (5th Cir. 2009) : Halliburton, KBR drop court appeal in rape case By RAMIT PLUSHNICK-MASTI Associated Press Writer © 2010 The Associated Press March 22, 2010, 5:09PM HOUSTON — Halliburton Co. and KBR Inc. have withdrawn an appeal asking the U.S. Supreme Court to block a lawsuit by a former military contrac

Continue reading...

Prawfsblawg: Allocating Power Between Courts and Arbitrators – and Why Scholars of Federal Courts Should Care

By Victoria VanBuren - February 23, 2010
Aaron Bruhl (pictured left) Professor at the University of Houston Law Center, has posted this interesting commentary at the Prawfsblawg yesterday about Rent-A-Center v. Jackson, the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court case about whether courts or arbitrators should decide the issue of unconscionability. (previously discussed here). Here is an excerpt: The Federal Arbitration Act makes arbitration agreements as enforceable as all other contracts. In Apri

Continue reading...

2009 Developments in Arbitration: Binding Non-signatories

By Victoria VanBuren - December 21, 2009
Recent opinions from the U.S. Supreme Court, the Texas Supreme Court, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit demonstrate that it is quite possible for an agreement to arbitrate to exist in the absence of an actual written agreement signed by both purportedly bound parties to the litigation. I. U.S. Supreme Court In March 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Arthur Anderson that a non-party to an arbitration agreement could appeal a t

Continue reading...

U.S. Supreme Court Decides Railway Labor Act Arbitration Case

By Victoria VanBuren - December 10, 2009
As we were ready to wrap-up the year, the U.S. Supreme Court decides yet another arbitration case. In Union Pacific v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, 558 U.S. ___(Dec. 8, 2009), the issue before the Court was whether pre-arbitration conference was a jurisdictional requirement. We will post a summary of the case after we read it and it will be added to our 2009 Year-End post as well.

Continue reading...

2009 Arbitration Case Law: U.S. Supreme Court

By Victoria VanBuren - December 8, 2009
Welcome to Disputing‘s 2009 Year-End Highlights. During this year, the U.S. Supreme Court decided several cases related to arbitration: On March 9, the Court decided Vaden v. Discover Bank. The issues were (1) whether a district court, if asked to compel arbitration, should “look through” the petition and grant the relief if the court would have federal-question jurisdiction of the controversy and (2) whether a district court should exercis

Continue reading...

Alternative Resolutions Article: Third Party Claims Regarding Arbitration

By Victoria VanBuren - August 19, 2009
Karl Bayer came across an interesting article published by the Alternative Dispute Resolution Section of the State Bar of Texas. Written by Wendy Trachte-Huber and Stephen Huber, Third Party Claims Regarding Arbitration comments on opinions by the U.S. Supreme Court, the Texas Supreme Court, and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals relating to the rights and duties of non-signatory parties to an arbitration agreement. Read the full article here. Te

Continue reading...

U.S. Supreme Court Vacates Sixth Circuit Decision that Nonsignatories May not Enforce Arbitration Agreement

By Victoria VanBuren - July 7, 2009
Looks like the U.S. Supreme Court can’t have enough of arbitration this term. As posted at the Adjunct Law Prof, the Court vacated and remanded Kimberlin v Renasant Bank (Dkt No 08-816). The issue decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit was whether non-parties to an arbitration agreement can invoke Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act and compel arbitration. The U.S. Supreme Court decided this issue recently in Arthur

Continue reading...

1234567

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy