In a per curiam arbitrability opinion released today, the Texas Supreme Court held that a fraudulent inducement claim must be arbitrated, if the contract which was allegedly fraudulently induced contained an arbitration clause, even if the party seeking to compel arbitration is not a signatory to that contract. The case involves fraudulent inducement claims by a group of student electricians against a vocational College; they allege that the Coll

Continue reading...

Yesterday, we posted about a Third Court of Appeals opinion where a party seeking to compel arbitration was found to have not established the existence of an agreement to arbitrate. Today, the Texas Supreme Court addresses the same issue but comes up with the opposite result. The case involved claims by investors against their stock broker based on Enron stock losses. In this case, the plaintiffs, who sought to avoid arbitration, signed contracts

Continue reading...

The Texas Supreme Court handed down six opinions today; none of them has anything to do with arbitration. Sadly, we’re too busy to discuss any of them at length. We would note, however, that one of the opinions discusses the economic loss rule, and how one goes about asserting it in Texas. Technorati Tags: litigation, Texas Supreme Court, law

Continue reading...

This past Friday, while Karl and I attended the Austin Bar Association’s annual Bench Bar conference, the Texas Supreme Court handed down another mandamus, per curiam opinion reversing trial court and court of appeals decisions not to compel arbitration. The case involved an employee of RLS Legal Solutions (“RLS”) named Amy Cobb Maida (“Maida”) who worked as a sales rep for RLS from 1997 until 2002. As per her employ

Continue reading...

Well, we have not posted much lately. There simply have not been any arbitration cases in the jurisdictions we routinely check (Texas, Fifth Circuit), and the actual law practice has been busy, so there has not been time to put something together in the “commentary” vein. However, that does not mean we have been ignoring arbitration issues. Later this morning, Karl will be presenting an update of his arbitration paper at the Austin Ba

Continue reading...

Early this Saturday morning, Todd Smith at the outstanding Texas Appellate Law Blog posted about the strange quirk in the law whereby trial courts’ refusals to compel arbitration are immediately reviewable by mandamus if one statute applies (the Federal Arbitration Act or “FAA”) or by interlocutory appeal is another applies (the Texas Arbitration Act or “TAA”). Mr. Smith noted that the legislature could amend the int

Continue reading...

While we’re on the subject of arguments one can use to try to prevent the confirmation of an arbitral award, we note that the Texas Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the Perry Homes case tomorrow. For more on the case see this article, or this one, or this one from a more mainstream source (the Dallas Morning News). The argument will supposedly be webcast, but when I tried to find specifics on the internet the Court’s website s

Continue reading...

This morning, the Texas Supreme Court handed down opinions in six cases; none had anything to do with arbitration. In an opinion on interlocutory appeal of an order certifying a class, Citizens Ins. Co. of America, et al. v. Daccach, et al., the Court decertified a class and remanded the case to the trial court. The case is a potential class action involving alleged violations of the Texas Securities Act. Moki Mac River Expeditions v. Drugg invol

Continue reading...

This morning, the Texas Supreme Court issued three opinions. The Texas Appellate Law Blog has already posted short summaries of them all (not that we have any interest in a race to do such things, but I would note that I was at the courthouse all morning and not able to check this morning’s orders as promptly as I like to). One of the opinions is another arbitration opinion, so we will discuss it in just a bit of detail. In a per curiam opi

Continue reading...

The Texas Supreme Court handed down five opinions this morning. None is about arbitration, so we’ll give them short shrift here. City of San Antonio v. TPLP Office Park Properties is a discussion of the City of San Antonio’s potential police power to close access to certain roadways in order to address residents’ complaints about commercial traffic in their neighborhood. Cause No. 04-1130. In Norris v. Thomas, a five-justice maj

Continue reading...