Menu
All articles tagged '"Texas Supreme Court"'
128 articles found
Texas Supreme Court Hears Interlocutory Appeal of an Arbitral Order
By Beth Graham - February 7, 2011
Last Thursday, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral argument in CMH Homes, Inc. et al. v. Perez, No. 10-0688. At issue in this case of first impression is an interlocutory appeal from an arbitration order filed pursuant to Section 51.016 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Section 51.016 is a recent addition to Code and became effective on September 1, 2009. Section 51.016 states: Sec. 51.016. APPEAL ARISING UNDER FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT
Texas Supreme Court to Hear Interlocutory Appeal of an Arbitral Order
By Beth Graham - January 19, 2011
On January 11th, the Supreme Court of Texas agreed to hear CMH Homes, Inc. et al. v. Perez, No. 10-0688. In the case, a dispute between a creditor and a purchaser of a mobile home arose. After both parties agreed their dispute was subject to arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act, a trial court signed an order compelling arbitration and appointing an arbitrator over CMH Homes’ objections that such an appointment was premature. CMH Ho
Houston Appeals Court Holds U.S. Courts Lack Authority Under Arbitration Agreement
By Beth Graham - January 6, 2011
In an interesting case currently on appeal to the Supreme Court of Texas, the Houston [1st] Court of Appeals vacated a trial court’s order appointing a three-person arbitration panel because the court was not the authority contemplated in the parties’ arbitration agreement. In In re Aramco Services Co., No. 01-09-00624-CV, (Tex. App. – Houston [1st], March 19, 2010), DynCorp International, LLC and Aramco entered into a contract for a comput
2010 Arbitration Case Law: Texas Supreme Court
By Beth Graham - January 3, 2011
Continuing our 2010 Year-End Highlights series, we present today a summary of noteworthy arbitration opinions handed down last year by the Texas Supreme Court. In East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co. v. Richard Leon Werline, No. 07-0135, (Tex. Mar. 12, 2010), the Texas Supreme Court held that the Texas General Arbitration Act allowed an appeal from a trial court’s order which denied confirmation of an arbitration award, vacated the award and direct
Supreme Court of Texas Holds Non-Binding Mediation Renders a Debtor a “Settling Person”
By Beth Graham - December 22, 2010
The Supreme Court of Texas has held that participation in a non-binding mediation rendered a debtor a “settling person” under Chapter 33 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code for purposes of determining proportionate liability. In MCI Sales & Serv. v. Hinton, No. 09-0048, (Tex. December 17, 2010), the owner and operator of a motorcoach rental service, Central Texas, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection after an accident in which
Supreme Court of Texas Rules on Four FAA Preemption Cases
By Beth Graham - December 7, 2010
The Supreme Court of Texas has held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempted the Texas General Arbitration Act (TAA) in three related general arbitration clauses, but that a similar, more specific clause was unenforceable under the TAA. In In re Olshan Foundation Repair Company, LLC, Nos. 09-0432, 09-0433, 09-0474, 09-0703, (Tex. December 3, 2010), Olshan was sued by four different customers (Waggoner, Kilpatrick, Tisdale and Tingdale) wh
Fifth Circuit Holds Arbitration Provision Illusory and Unenforceable
By Beth Graham - October 29, 2010
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has held in an unpublished opinion that an arbitration provision in a multilevel marketing program contract which could be amended at the sole discretion of one party and bound the other party “upon notice” was illusory and unenforceable. In Juan Torres v. S.G.E. Management, L.L.C., No. 09-20778, (5th Cir., October 5, 2010), Ignite operated as a subsidiary of a retail provider of electricity in Texas. Ignite rel
Texas Supreme Court Holds Arbitration Agreement Does Not Require Savings Clause
By Beth Graham - October 25, 2010
The Texas Supreme Court has held that an arbitration agreement signed as a condition of continued employment was not illusory and did not require a savings clause. In In re 24R, Inc., D/B/A The Boot Jack, No. 09-1025 (Tex. Oct. 22, 2010), Frances Cabrera was an at-will employee for 24R, Inc. d/b/a “The Boot Jack” for approximately 15 years. In 2003, 2004 and 2005 she signed an arbitration agreement as a condition of continued employment. In 2007,
GUEST-POST | eDiscovery Update: Special Masters and eMediation
By Victoria VanBuren - July 28, 2010
By Peter S. Vogel Special Masters can help Judges and parties in eDiscovery disputes and also reduce the cost of litigation. Also managing eDiscovery can be improved by using eMediators who can help simply eDiscovery disputes and reduce motion practice. My recent article in the Texas Lawyer discusses some of the benefits of eMediation and Special Masters in eDiscovery. Over the past 20 years I have served as a Mediator and Special Master in compu
Commentary on In re Merrill Lynch & Co | Texas Supreme Court Case
By Victoria VanBuren - July 22, 2010
By William G. Whitehill In In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner; Smith Incorporated, __ S.W.3d __ (June 25, 2010 slip op.), the Texas Supreme Court conditionally granted mandamus relief in favor of Merrill Lynch, staying litigation against it by a non-signatory company when that company’s sister company that was a signatory to an arbitration agreement was also asserting identical claims that were potentiall
Legal Research
Recent Posts
Search
Legal Research
© 2026, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy