Menu
All articles tagged '"Texas Supreme Court"'
128 articles found
GUEST-POST | Texas “Loser Pays” Rules May Exclude Mediation in Some Small Cases But Overall Impact Muted
By Victoria VanBuren - March 5, 2012
By Mike Schless and Don Philbin The “Loser Pays” Legislation that passed the 82nd Legislature and became effective September 1, 2011 did not contain the highly controversial loser pay provision of earlier drafts, but did direct the Texas Supreme Court to adopt rule revisions, one of which could impact ADR practice in smaller cases. Among other things, HB 274 required the Supreme Court to adopt rules to promote the “prompt, efficient, and cost-eff
Texas Supreme Court Rules on Selection of Arbitrators
By Victoria VanBuren - February 6, 2012
In Americo Life, Inc. v. Myer, No. 10-0734 (Tex. Dec. 16, 2011), Americo Life, Inc., Americo Financial Life and Annuity Insurance Company, Great Southern Life Insurance Company, the Ohio State Life Insurance Company, and National Farmers’ Union Life Insurance Company (hereinafter “Americo”) and Robert L. Myer and Strider Marketing Group, Inc. (hereinafter “Myer”) contracted for Americo’s purchase of several ins
Texas Lawyer: Family Law Council Files Rare Amicus Over Mediation Issue
By Victoria VanBuren - January 26, 2012
We found this interesting story in Texas Lawyer about a mediated settlement agreement: For the first time in 25 years, the State Bar of Texas Family Law Council has filed an amicus curiae brief in an appeal pending before the Texas Supreme Court. The council submitted the brief on Jan. 9, urging the Supreme Court to grant a mandamus to force a family law judge to approve a mediated settlement agreement (MSA) in a custody dispute. The judge in tha
2011 Arbitration Case Law | Texas Supreme Court
By Victoria VanBuren - December 22, 2011
Continuing our 2011 Year-End Highlights series, we present today noteworthy arbitration cases heard by the Texas Supreme Court. On February 27, 2011, the Texas Supreme Court denied cert to a case where agreement required arbitrator to be Saudi National or Muslim Foreigner. In In re Aramco Services Co., No. 01-09-00624-CV, (Tex. App. – Houston [1st], March 19, 2010), DynCorp International, LLC and Aramco entered into a contract for a computer syst
2011 Arbitration Case Law | U.S. Supreme Court
By Victoria VanBuren - December 20, 2011
Welcome to Disputing‘s 2011 Year-End Highlights. During this year, the U.S. Supreme Court decided several cases related to arbitration: On April 27, 2011, in a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the the Federal Arbitration Act preempted California law with regard to class arbitration in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion, 09-893, (April 27, 2011). Read James Gaitis guest-posts about the case here and here. On May 17, 2011,
U.S. Supreme Court Denies Cert to Nafta Traders v. Quinn
By Victoria VanBuren - October 24, 2011
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court denied cert to Nafta Traders, Inc. v. Quinn, 339 S.W.3d 84 (Tex. 2011). In Nafta Traders, the Texas Supreme Court had held that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) did not preempt enforcement of an agreement for expanded judicial review of an arbitration award enforceable under the Texas Arbitration Act (“TAA”). Such enforcement was consistent with the FAA’s purpose of ensuring that
Texas Supreme Court Declines to Follow Hall Street in Arbitration Case: Nafta Traders, Inc. v. Quinn
By Victoria VanBuren - May 13, 2011
The Supreme Court of Texas has held that the Texas General Arbitration Act (TAA) allows judicial review of arbitral awards by agreement beyond what the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) allows. Justice Hecht delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Jefferson, Justice Wainwright, Justice Medina, Justice Green, Justice Johnson, Justice Willett, Justice Guzman, and Justice Lehrmann joined. Chief Justice Jefferson, joined by Justice Wai
Supreme Court of Texas Holds TAA Applies Where No Evidence to the Contrary Demonstrated
By Beth Graham - April 5, 2011
The Supreme Court of Texas has held in a per curiam opinion that the Texas General Arbitration Act (TAA) applied to a dispute where a party invoked the TAA in a hearing on a motion to compel arbitration and no evidence was offered to show the TAA did not apply despite that the motion itself failed to invoke the act. In Ellis v. Schlimmer, No. 10-0243 (Tex., April 1, 2011), Ron and Tana Schlimmer purchased a home in Corpus Christi, TX from Veronic
Texas Supreme Court Denies Cert. Where Agreement Required Arbitrator to be Saudi National or Muslim Foreigner
By Beth Graham - March 16, 2011
The Supreme Court of Texas has denied a party’s petition for a writ of mandamus after the Houston [1st] Court of Appeals held U.S. courts lacked authority to appoint an arbitration panel. In In re Aramco Services Co., No. 01-09-00624-CV, (Tex. App. – Houston [1st], March 19, 2010), DynCorp International, LLC and Aramco entered into a contract for a computer system which was to be manufactured in the U.S. and installed at Aramco’s offices in Saudi
Texas Supreme Court Holds Arbitration Agreement May Grant Non-Signatories the Right to Compel Arbitration
By Beth Graham - March 14, 2011
The Supreme Court of Texas has held “parties to an arbitration agreement may grant non-signatories the right to compel arbitration.” In In re Rubiola, No. 09-0309, (Tex., March 11, 2011), Brian and Christina Salmon agreed to purchase a home from Greg and Catherine Rubiola with J.C. Rubiola acting as listing broker for the transaction. Brothers Greg and J.C. Rubiola jointly operate a number of real estate and mortgage companies in San Antonio, inc
Legal Research
Recent Posts
Search
Legal Research
© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy