Menu
All articles tagged '"Supreme Court"'
379 articles found
GUEST-POST PART I | States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
By Victoria VanBuren - May 24, 2011
By S.I. Strong AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011), always promised to be an interesting case. Not only did the dispute concern class arbitration, one of the most controversial procedural devices to develop in recent years, it did so in a way that set corporate interests squarely against states’ rights. Given that several Supreme Court Justices who are perceived as supporting big business also appear to favor federalist cau
U.S. Supreme Court Denies Cert to Arbitration Case
By Victoria VanBuren - May 17, 2011
Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari (No. 10-1213) to Trustmark Ins. Co. v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co., 631 F.3d 869 ( 7th Cir. 2011). The Seventh Circuit had held that an arbitration panel has authority to determine what a confidentiality agreement requires, when the agreement was closely related to an insurance arbitration that was already underway. The questions presented to the U.S. Supreme Court were: May a party be compelled
Texas Supreme Court Declines to Follow Hall Street in Arbitration Case: Nafta Traders, Inc. v. Quinn
By Victoria VanBuren - May 13, 2011
The Supreme Court of Texas has held that the Texas General Arbitration Act (TAA) allows judicial review of arbitral awards by agreement beyond what the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) allows. Justice Hecht delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Jefferson, Justice Wainwright, Justice Medina, Justice Green, Justice Johnson, Justice Willett, Justice Guzman, and Justice Lehrmann joined. Chief Justice Jefferson, joined by Justice Wai
Senator Al Franken Announces Plan to Reintroduce the Arbitration Fairness Act
By Victoria VanBuren - May 9, 2011
In response to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in AT&T, Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion, Senator Al Franken announced his plan to reintroduce the Arbitration Fairness Act . The Act would ban mandatory arbitration clauses in employment, consumer, and civil rights cases. “This ruling is another example of the Supreme Court favoring corporations over consumers,” said Sen. Franken. “The Arbitration Fairness Act would help rectify th
AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion | Blawgosphere Round-up on Class Arbitration Decision
By Victoria VanBuren - May 5, 2011
On April 27, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion. The question presented was whether the FAA prohibits states from conditioning the enforceability of certain arbitration agreements on the availability of class-wide arbitration procedures. We thought you would like to read some interesting commentary about the opinion: AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion: FAA preempts rule that makes class action waivers in ar
U.S. Supreme Court Grants Certiorari to Consumer Arbitration Case
By Victoria VanBuren - May 4, 2011
On May 2, 2011 the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to yet another consumer arbitration case, CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood, No. 10-948. In Greenwood, the Ninth Circuit decided whether the word “sue,” as used in the Credit Repair Organization Act (“CROA”) means “arbitrate.” The court concluded that Congress meant what it said in using the term “sue,” and that it did not mean “arbitrate.” The Supreme Court is expected to resolve a spit betwe
U.S. Supreme Court Decides AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion
By Beth Graham - April 27, 2011
In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled today that the the Federal Arbitration Act preempted California law with regard to class arbitration in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion, 09-893, (April 27, 2011). Check back for more information on the case soon. Disputing‘s previous blog posted after the Court heard oral argument in the case is available here. Technorati Tags: law, ADR, arbitration
Law Review Article | Regulating Mandatory Arbitration
By Beth Graham - April 15, 2011
A new paper entitled Regulating Mandatory Arbitration, is available from Thomas Burch, Assistant Visiting Professor in Law at the Florida State University College of Law. (Utah Law Review, 2011; FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 493.) In his paper, Professor Burch examines mandatory arbitration jurisprudence and reform efforts over the past twenty-five years. Here is the abstract: Over the last twenty-five years, the Supreme Court
Supreme Court of Texas Holds TAA Applies Where No Evidence to the Contrary Demonstrated
By Beth Graham - April 5, 2011
The Supreme Court of Texas has held in a per curiam opinion that the Texas General Arbitration Act (TAA) applied to a dispute where a party invoked the TAA in a hearing on a motion to compel arbitration and no evidence was offered to show the TAA did not apply despite that the motion itself failed to invoke the act. In Ellis v. Schlimmer, No. 10-0243 (Tex., April 1, 2011), Ron and Tana Schlimmer purchased a home in Corpus Christi, TX from Veronic
Texas Supreme Court Denies Cert. Where Agreement Required Arbitrator to be Saudi National or Muslim Foreigner
By Beth Graham - March 16, 2011
The Supreme Court of Texas has denied a party’s petition for a writ of mandamus after the Houston [1st] Court of Appeals held U.S. courts lacked authority to appoint an arbitration panel. In In re Aramco Services Co., No. 01-09-00624-CV, (Tex. App. – Houston [1st], March 19, 2010), DynCorp International, LLC and Aramco entered into a contract for a computer system which was to be manufactured in the U.S. and installed at Aramco’s offices in Saudi
Legal Research
Recent Posts
Search
Legal Research
© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy