Menu
All articles tagged '"Federal Arbitration Act"'
84 articles found
U.S. Supreme Court Grants Cert to Class Arbitration Case
By Victoria VanBuren - November 14, 2012
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, Docket No. 12-133. The issue is whether the Federal Arbitration Act permits courts, invoking the “federal substantive law of arbitrability,” to invalidate arbitration agreements on the ground that they do not permit class arbitration of a federal-law claim. Read our previous post about the case below here. Bloomberg’s coverage of the case is
U.S Supreme Court Considers Two Arbitration Petitions
By Victoria VanBuren - November 8, 2012
The U.S. Supreme Court is currently considering two significant arbitration-related petitions: BG Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina, Docket No. 12-138. The issue is whether, in disputes involving a multi-staged dispute resolution process, a court or the arbitrator determines whether a precondition to arbitration has been satis?ed. Opinion below: Republic of Argentina v. BG Group PLC, 665 F.3d 1363 (D.C. Cir. 2012) Nitro-Lift Technologies,
Article | What Constitutes an ‘Agreement in Writing’ in International Commercial Arbitration? Conflicts Between the New York Convention and the Federal Arbitration Act
By Victoria VanBuren - October 10, 2012
Professor S.I. Strong (University of Missouri School of Law) has published “What Constitutes an ‘Agreement in Writing’ in International Commercial Arbitration? Conflicts Between the New York Convention and the Federal Arbitration Act,” 48 Stanford Journal of International Law 47 (2012). The abstract is: This Article investigates whether and to what extent a party must produce an “agreement in writing” when seeking to enforce an intern
Eleventh Circuit Rules that Delegation Provision is Valid under the Federal Arbitration Act
By Victoria VanBuren - June 14, 2012
In In re Checking Account Overdraft Litigation, No. 11-14282 (11th Cir. March 21, 2012). Maxine Given filed a class action against Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (M&T Bank), alleging that M&T Bank improperly charged its checking account customers overdraft fees. The customer agreement included an arbitration clause obligating customers to arbitrate disputes arising out of the checking account; it also stated that whether a disput
Ninth Circuit Rules on Enforceability of Class Action Waiver Under the Federal Arbitration Act
By Victoria VanBuren - April 4, 2012
In Coneff v. AT&T, No. 09-35563 (9th Cir. March 16, 2012), Plaintiffs are current and former customers of defendants, New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., and AT&T Mobility, LLC (“AT&T”). Plaintiffs filed a class action against AT&T, which responded by seeking to enforce an arbitration agreement contained in its contracts with Plaintiffs. The service agreement requires individualized arbitration of “all disputes and claims,” and
U.S. Supreme Court Decides CompuCredit v. Greenwood
By Victoria VanBuren - January 11, 2012
Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down CompuCredit Corporation v. Greenwood. The issue in CompuCredit was whether claims under the Credit Repair Organizations Act are subject to arbitration. The Court held that because the Credit Repair Organizations Act is silent on whether claims can proceed in an arbitrable forum, the Federal Arbitration Act requires the arbitration agreement to be enforced according to its terms. The opinion is here. W
KPMG LLP v Cocchi | U.S. Supreme Court Holds that a Court May Not Deny Arbitration When Some of the Claims Are Nonarbitrable
By Victoria VanBuren - November 14, 2011
Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court held that courts must enforce arbitration agreements even if the plaintiff’s Complaint contains nonarbitrable claims. In KPMG LLP v. Cocchi, 565 U.S. ___ ( 2011) the Fourth District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida upheld a trial court’s refusal to compel arbitration in a lawsuit involving claims brought against the auditing firm KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) by investors owners of a limited pa
Eleventh Circuit Rules that the Plaintiff’s Act of Amending its Complaint May Allow a Defendant to Resurrect its Previously-Waived Right to Arbitrate
By Victoria VanBuren - September 29, 2011
In Krinsk v. Suntrust Banks, Inc., No. 10-11912 (11th Cir. Sept. 7, 2011) the defendant had participated in the case for nine months without enforcing its right to arbitrate the class action claims. In response to the court’s ruling on the motion to dismiss, the plaintiff amended the complaint and expanded the definition of the putative class from one that covered hundreds of members to one that potentially covered tens of thousands of members. I
Article | The Third Arbitration Trilogy: Stolt-Nielsen, Rent-A-Center, Concepcion and the Future of American Arbitration
By Victoria VanBuren - September 7, 2011
We invite you to check out Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich latest article, “The Third Arbitration Trilogy: Stolt-Nielsen, Rent-A-Center, Concepcion and the Future of American Arbitration,” American Review of International Arbitration (forthcoming). Here is the abstract: For the third time in the modern era, a triad of key Supreme Court decisions represents a milestone in American arbitration. In this highly controversial “Third Arbitration Trilog
In Texas, Can a Court Refer my Case to Mediation?
By Victoria VanBuren - May 27, 2011
By Brett Goodman Under the Texas ADR Act, by either the motion of the court or a party, a pending dispute may be referred to mediation except when that dispute is subject to the Federal Arbitration Act. In this referral, an “impartial third party” must be appointed to mediate. To qualify for an appointment as an impartial third party, a person must have completed a minimum of forty hours of training in dispute resolution techniques in a course co
Legal Research
Recent Posts
Search
Legal Research
© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy