• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


All articles tagged '"district court"'

194 articles found

Judge Waxse E-Discovery Roundup

By Victoria VanBuren - November 12, 2012
by Jeremy Clare After blogging about In the Matter of Applications for Search Warrants for Information Associated with Target Email Address, we have come across several noteworthy materials related to e-discovery written by the Honorable David J. Waxse, the author of the Order. Judge Waxse is a Magistrate Judge with the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas and a well-known scholar on e-discovery. He is an Observer to The Sedona Conferen

Continue reading...

U.S. District Court Denies Applications for Search Warrants for Electronic Communications Due to Over-Breadth

By Victoria VanBuren - November 5, 2012
by Jeremy Clare Magistrate Judge David Waxse of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas denied two applications for search warrants in which the government sought to gain emails and faxes from accounts used by an individual that allegedly used the accounts in an email spam campaign to defraud other individuals. Magistrate Judge Waxse denied the applications because the warrants, as proposed, violated the Fourth Amendment. In I

Continue reading...

Middle District of Pennsylvania Holds that D.R. Horton Does Not Conflict with Concepcion

By Victoria VanBuren - October 2, 2012
by Jeremy Clare The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania denied a motion for reconsideration of the court’s order compelling arbitration because plaintiffs failed to establish a change in controlling law. Background In Brown v. Trueblue, Inc., No. 10-CV-0514 (M.D. PA April 16, 2012), Stephen Brown and Matthew Jury (“plaintiffs”), two employees of Trueblue, a temporary staffing agency, filed a complaint with the dis

Continue reading...

Southern District of New York Holds that Arbitrators Did Not Manifestly Disregard the Law

By Victoria VanBuren - September 24, 2012
by Jeremy Clare The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York confirmed an arbitration award and granted attorney’s fees in favor the defendant because the plaintiffs’ claims were meritless and lacked any proper purpose. Background In DigiTelCom, Ltd., et al., v. Tele2 Sverige AB, No. 12-CV-3253 (S.D. N.Y. July 25, 2012), two Russian telecommunications companies, DigiTelCom, Ltd. (“DTC”) and Tele2 Sverige AB (“Tele2”), we

Continue reading...

Texas Court of Appeals Reversed Vacatur of $125 Million Arbitration Award

By Victoria VanBuren - September 17, 2012
by Jeremy Clare The Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas reversed the district court’s vacatur of a $125 million arbitration award and confirmed the award because the appellee failed to raise its complaint during the arbitration process. Background In Ponderosa Pine Energy, LLC, v. Tenaska Energy, Inc., et al, No. 05-10-00516-CV (Tex.App.—Dallas August 20, 2012), an arbitration panel awarded Ponderosa Pine Energy, LLC (“Pond

Continue reading...

Fifth Circuit Decides on Arbitrability of Claims

By Victoria VanBuren - September 10, 2012
by Jeremy Clare The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling confirming an arbitration award. In Petrofac, Inc., v. DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Company, No. 1-20141 (5th Cir. July 17, 2012), DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Company (“DM”), which operates the Strategic Petroleum Reserve for the Department of Energy, contracted with Petrofac to design and install a transportable degas plant to

Continue reading...

Fifth Circuit Rules on Arbitrator Appointment Process

By Victoria VanBuren - September 6, 2012
by Jeremy Clare The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the district court exceeded its authority under 9 U.S.C. § 5 by not limiting the number of arbitrators appointed to the number agreed to by the parties in the arbitration agreement.   Background In BP Exploration Libya Ltd., v. ExxonMobil Libya Ltd., v. Noble North Africa Ltd. No. 11-20547 (5th Cir. July 30, 2012), ExxonMobil Libya (“Exxon”) and N

Continue reading...

Fifth Circuit Rules that Arbitrator Bias Issue Must be Raised Before the Arbitration Award Is Rendered

By Victoria VanBuren - August 27, 2012
In Dealer Computer Servs. v. Michael Motor Co., No. 11-20053 (5th Cir. Aug. 14, 2012) Dealer Computer Services (“DCS”) provides hardware maintenance, software support, and computer hardware to automobile dealer Michael Motor Company (“MMC”). Their hardware and service contract contained an arbitration clause requiring the parties to resolve disputes in accordance with the Commercial Rules of the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”). A dispute

Continue reading...

Armstrong v. Tygart | Hearing is Today

By Victoria VanBuren - August 10, 2012
by Renée Kolar This week, in anticipation of today’s hearing in front of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, we’ve been summarizing the legal issues raised in Lance Armstrong’s Amended Complaint and USADA and Tygart’s responses in their motion to dismiss. Today, the District Court will decide whether or not it should enjoin Defendants from enforcing an arbitration deadline against Armstrong while the lawsui

Continue reading...

Eleventh Circuit Rules that Delegation Provision is Valid under the Federal Arbitration Act

By Victoria VanBuren - June 14, 2012
In In re Checking Account Overdraft Litigation, No. 11-14282 (11th Cir. March 21, 2012). Maxine Given filed a class action against Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (M&T Bank), alleging that M&T Bank improperly charged its checking account customers overdraft fees. The customer agreement included an arbitration clause obligating customers to arbitrate disputes arising out of the checking account; it also stated that whether a disput

Continue reading...

« First‹ Previous8910111213141516Next ›Last »

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy