Menu
All articles tagged '"Discover Bank"'
13 articles found
A Uniform Theory of Federal Court Jurisdiction Under the Federal Arbitration Act
By Beth Graham - June 9, 2016
Kristen Blankley, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Nebraska College of Law, has published a thought-provoking paper entitled, “A Uniform Theory of Federal Court Jurisdiction Under the Federal Arbitration Act,” George Mason Law Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2016.
A Uniform Theory of Federal Court Jurisdiction Under the Federal Arbitration Act
By Beth Graham - April 7, 2015
Assistant Professor of Law Kristen Blankley, University of Nebraska College of Law, has published a thoughtful paper entitled, “A Uniform Theory of Federal Court Jurisdiction Under the Federal Arbitration Act,” George Mason Law Review, Forthcoming.
Is the Supreme Court Moving Towards a Preemptive Federal Arbitration Procedural Paradigm?
By Beth Graham - April 11, 2013
Adopted by Congress in 1925, the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) established a federal “pro-arbitration policy. But courts and scholars have been wrestling for decades over what this federal “proarbitration policy” actually means. The Concepcion decision came on the heels of the Court’s 2010 decision in Stolt-Nielsen S A.
Corporate Counsel: Citi, Discover Can’t Shake Credit Card Antitrust Suit Over Arbitration
By Victoria VanBuren - February 23, 2012
Do credit card agreements still contain mandatory arbitration provisions? here is an update from Corporate Counsel: We’ve been deluged with news about challenges to mandatory arbitration clauses over the last few months, ever since the U.S. Supreme Court issued its AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion opinion last April. So it’s refreshing to read a decision on arbitration provisions with a twist: in this case a good old-fashioned (alleged
Fifth Circuit Rules on Jurisdiction for a Petition to Compel Arbitration
By Victoria VanBuren - January 30, 2012
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that a district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear a petition to compel arbitration pursuant to Section 4 of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”). In Volvo Trucks N. America, Inc. v. Crescent Ford Truck Sales, Inc. No. 09-30782, (5th Cir. Jan. 5, 2012) Crescent Ford Truck Sales, Inc. (“Crescent”) operated a Volvo dealership pursuant to a Dealer Sale
Second Circuit Remands Fensterstock v. Education Finance Partners
By Victoria VanBuren - July 5, 2011
On June 30, 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit remanded Fensterstock v. Education Finance Partners for initial consideration of the arbitration issues. Fensterstock involves a class-action and class-arbitration waiver provision in a promissory note of a law student loan. Read more here. Following is the summary order: In Fensterstock v. Education Finance Partners, 611 F.3d 124 (2d Cir. 2010) (“Fensterstock II“), va
GUEST-POST PART I | States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
By Victoria VanBuren - May 24, 2011
By S.I. Strong AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011), always promised to be an interesting case. Not only did the dispute concern class arbitration, one of the most controversial procedural devices to develop in recent years, it did so in a way that set corporate interests squarely against states’ rights. Given that several Supreme Court Justices who are perceived as supporting big business also appear to favor federalist cau
Guest Post Part II.B | AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion: Can Discover Bank Withstand Stolt-Nielsen Scrutiny?
By Beth Graham - December 6, 2010
Part II.B: Section 2 Express Preemption – Purposive Analysis by Philip J. Loree Jr. I. Introduction In Part II.A, we considered a textual construction of Section 2’s savings clause and concluded that it supports AT&T Mobility’s position. This Part II.B examines the savings clause from a purposive interpretation and construction standpoint. For the sake of convenience, the term “purposive” or “purposivism” is used here as a convenient way to d
Guest Post Part II.A | AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion: Can Discover Bank Withstand Stolt-Nielsen Scrutiny?
By Beth Graham - November 29, 2010
Part II.A: Section 2 Express Preemption – Textual Analysis by Philip J. Loree Jr. I. Introduction Part I of this series (here) was published the day before the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion, No. 09-893 (blogged here, here, here and here). Now that the argument has taken place, and we have had a chance to review the transcript (here), and listen to the audio (here), it’s time to begin delvi
Guest Post Part I | AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion: Can Discover Bank Withstand Stolt-Nielsen Scrutiny?
By Beth Graham - November 8, 2010
by Philip J. Loree Jr. Part I: Introduction Virtually every year the United States Supreme Court’s docket features a number of politically-charged, controversial cases, plus some run-of-the-mill ones that do not inspire much in the way of intensive, ideological debate. Generally the Court’s arbitration-related cases fall into this latter category, though last term saw the Court decide 5-3 and 5-4 along ideological lines two politically controvers
12
Legal Research
Recent Posts
Search
Legal Research
© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy