Menu
All articles tagged '"CAS"'
15 articles found
Court of Arbitration for Sport Overturns Lifetime Olympics Ban for 28 Russian Athletes Accused of Doping
By Beth Graham - February 5, 2018
Last week, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (“CAS”) delivered a decision related to 39 lifetime athlete bans that were issued by the Disciplinary Commission of the International Olympic Committee (“IOC”).
Comparing NCAA and Olympic Athlete Eligibility Dispute Resolution Systems in Light of Procedural Fairness and Substantive Justice
By Beth Graham - January 9, 2017
Josephine R. Potuto, Richard H. Larson Professor of Constitutional Law and National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”) Faculty Representative at the University of Nebraska College of Law, and Matt Mitten, Professor of Law and Executive Director of the National Sports Law Institute at Marquette University Law School, have published “Comparing NCAA and Olympic Athlete Eligibility Dispute Resolution Systems in Light of Procedural Fairness and
The Rules of the CAS Anti-Doping Division and the CAS Ad Hoc Division at the Olympic Games
By Beth Graham - August 8, 2016
Despina Mavromati, Managing Counsel and Head of Research & Mediation at the Court of Arbitration for Sport, has written a timely paper entitled, “The Rules of the CAS Anti-Doping Division and the CAS Ad Hoc Division at the Olympic Games.”
Top 10 Disputing Posts of 2012
By Victoria VanBuren - January 2, 2013
Happy New Year from Disputing! We are pleased to share with you our 10 most popular blog posts of 2012: 1. USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part IV | The Arbitration Hearing (Jul. 25, 2012) 2. USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part I | USADA ‘Results Management’ (Jul. 19, 2012) 3. USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part III | The Appointment of Arbitrators (
2012 Year-End Highlights | USADA Case against Lance Armstrong
By Victoria VanBuren - December 18, 2012
Welcome to Disputing‘s 2012 Year End-Highlights. Perhaps one of the most publicized cases in the modern history of sports was Lance Armstrong’s controversy with the U.S. Anti-doping agency. Following are our 2012 posts related to the case: UCI Recognizes Sanctions against Lance Armstrong, Disputing, October 23, 2012 USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | Statute of Limitations, Disputing, October 22, 2012 USADA Case agains
UCI Recognizes Sanctions against Lance Armstrong
By Victoria VanBuren - October 23, 2012
by Jeremy Clare On October 22, 2012, the International Cycling Union (UCI) released its decision regarding USADA’s case against Lance Armstrong. UCI came to three main conclusions: (1) UCI will not appeal USADA’s reasoned decision to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS); (2) UCI will recognize and implement USADA’s reasoned decision; and (3) UCI will disqualify all competitive results achieved by Mr. Armstrong from August 1, 1998 thereafter.
USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | Statute of Limitations
By Victoria VanBuren - October 22, 2012
by Jeremy Clare USADA is seeking the disqualification of all of Mr. Lance Armstrong’s competitive results from August 1, 1998 onward. According to Article 17 of the World Anti-Doping Code, the statute of limitations for an action brought against an athlete is eight years from the date that the alleged violation(s) occurred. However, USADA claimed that the statute of limitations was suspended because Mr. Armstrong concealed the violations. In its
USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | Standard of Proof and Means of Proof
By Victoria VanBuren - October 17, 2012
by Jeremy Clare Standard of Proof According to Article 3.1 of the World Anti-Doping Code (the Code), USADA bore the burden of establishing Mr. Armstrong’s violations of the Code. “This standard of proof in all cases is greater than a mere balance of probability but less than proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” USADA noted in the Reasoned Decision that the standard is comparable to the standard applied to other cases of professional misconduct. In t
USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Issues its Reasoned Opinion Describing its Evidence against Lance Armstrong
By Victoria VanBuren - October 15, 2012
On October 10, 2012, the United States Anti-doping Agency (“USADA”) issued a 202-page reasoned decision describing evidence against Lance Armstrong and alleged rule violations (the “Reasoned Decision”). Under Articles 8.3 and 13.2.3 of the World Anti-Doping Code (the “Code”), USADA is obligated to send its Reasoned Decision to the parties with the having the right to appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (“CA
USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | Remaining Procedural Steps
By Victoria VanBuren - August 29, 2012
by Jeremy Clare Even though Lance Armstrong decided on August 23rd not to proceed to arbitration with the United States Anti-Doping Agency (“USADA”), the process for sanctioning Mr. Armstrong has not been completed. There are remaining procedural steps that must occur before the sanctions are finalized. Under Article 8.3 of the World Anti-Doping Code (the “Code”), USADA is obligated to send Mr. Armstrong, the International
12
Legal Research
Recent Posts
Search
Legal Research
© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy