Menu
All articles tagged '"arbitration provision"'
95 articles found
Fifth Circuit Holds Arbitration Provision Illusory and Unenforceable
By Beth Graham - October 29, 2010
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has held in an unpublished opinion that an arbitration provision in a multilevel marketing program contract which could be amended at the sole discretion of one party and bound the other party “upon notice” was illusory and unenforceable. In Juan Torres v. S.G.E. Management, L.L.C., No. 09-20778, (5th Cir., October 5, 2010), Ignite operated as a subsidiary of a retail provider of electricity in Texas. Ignite rel
Fifth Circuit Rules Arbitrability Question is for Arbitrator to Decide Where Parties Clearly Intended So
By Beth Graham - September 9, 2010
The Fifth Circuit has held that the question of arbitrability is for an arbitrator to decide where an arbitration agreement exists between the parties and they clearly intended for the issue to be arbitrated based on the wording of the arbitration provision. In Allen v. Regions Bank, No. 09-60705, (5th Cir., August 11, 2010), plaintiffs (the Allens) obtained a home equity loan from First American National Bank in October 1999. The bank withheld f
GUEST-POST | Possible Outcomes for Class Arbitration Waivers in Consumer Contracts
By Victoria VanBuren - June 2, 2010
[Ed. note: Following find interesting comments about AT&T v. Concepcion, a case pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. Read more about the case here. These comments were first posted at Paul Lurie’s excellent listserv and we are reprinting them with the author’s permission.] By James M. Gaitis Ultimately, we are faced with at least four different possible outcomes for consumer arbitration provisions containing class preclusion clauses.
GUEST-POST | Texas Supreme Court Compels Arbitration in Slip and Fall at Hospice
By Victoria VanBuren - May 10, 2010
By Glen M. Wilkerson Last Friday, the Texas Supreme Court handed down another arbitration case in In Re Odyssey Healthcare. P worked at hospice. She had employment agreement with non-subscriber (no worker’s compensation) that included an arbitration provision. She slipped at the home of a patient. P lived and accident occurred in El Paso. The Arbitration language provided: Panel of arbitrators would be from Dallas County. The Court compelle
Texas Federal Court Holds that Arbitration Agreement Naming NAF as the Arbitrator is Unenforceable
By Victoria VanBuren - April 26, 2010
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division held that an arbitration agreement naming the National Arbitration Forum (NAF) as the arbitrator was unenforceable because NAF (now unavailable) was an integral part of the arbitration provision. In Ranzy v. Extra Cash of Texas, No. H-09-3334, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22551 (S.D. Tex. March 11, 2010), the arbitration clause at issue stated, AGREEMENT TO ARBITRATE A
Texas Appellate Court Enforces Attorney-Client Arbitration Agreement
By Victoria VanBuren - March 11, 2010
The Fourteenth Court of Appeals of Texas held that a trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion to compel arbitration. I. Background In Pham v. Letney, no. 14-09-00387-CV (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] March 4, 2010) Shelly Letney hired the law firm of Smith & Garg, L.L.C. to pursue her personal injury claims she allegedly suffered in an automobile accident. Sarita Garg is a named partner in the firm and Steven Tuan Pham, an associ
Halliburton/KBR Files Cert. in Jones v. Halliburton
By Victoria VanBuren - February 8, 2010
Via On Point News, we learned that Halliburton/KBR has recently filed a petition for certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Jones v. Halliburton, 583 F.3d 228 (5th Cir. 2009). The issue is whether the arbitration provision in an employment contract includes the tort claim of sexual assault. The petition presents this question: Respondent Jamie Leigh Jones filed a complaint in federal district court against her employer, seeking redres
Jones v. Halliburton: Fifth Circuit Rules on Arbitration of Tort Claims by an Employee
By Victoria VanBuren - September 18, 2009
[Ed. note: see our previous posts about this case here and here.] The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that claims for (1) assault and battery; (2) intentional infliction of emotional distress; (3) negligent hiring, retention and supervision of employees involved in a sexual assault; and (4) false imprisonment are not related to the plaintiff’s employment contract and refused to compel arbitration. I. Background In
Texas Supreme Court Finds that Court Abused Its Discretion by Allowing Pre-Arbitration Discovery
By Victoria VanBuren - July 21, 2009
The Supreme Court of Texas held that a court abused its discretion by permitting discovery instead of deciding a motion to compel arbitration. In re Houston Pipe Line Co., __S.W.3d __ (Texas 2009) (No. 08-0800) involves a gas purchase agreement between Houston Pipe Line Company, L.P. and O’Connor & Hewitt, Ltd. The agreement was based on the Houston Ship Channel Price Index (the “Index”) and contained the following arbitrati
Texas Federal Court Finds Blockbuster’s Online User Agreement ‘Illusory’ and Denies Motion to Compel Arbitration
By Victoria VanBuren - June 24, 2009
[Ed. note: This case is a bit old, but an important one. It somehow got lost in the pile of papers sitting on my desk. Thanks to San Antonio arbitrator and mediator Don Philbin for bringing this case to our attention back in April. ] The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas held that an arbitration clause in Blockbuster’s Online User Agreement is illusory, thus, unenforceable and denied Blockbuster’s motion
Legal Research
Recent Posts
Search
Legal Research
© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy