• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


All articles tagged '"arbitration clause"'

137 articles found

Dallas COA Refuses to Compel Non-Signatory to Arbitration

By Beth Graham - April 18, 2011
The Dallas Appeals Court has refused to compel a non-signatory to a contract to arbitrate under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”). In Carr v. Main Carr Development, LLC, No. 05-10-01346-CV, (Tex. App. – Dallas, 03/31/2011), Main Carr Development (“MCD”) was a limited liability corporation organized to engage in real estate development projects. An operating agreement which did not contain an arbitration clause authorized MCD to engage in a vari

Continue reading...

N.D. of Texas Holds Signatory May Enjoin Another Signatory From Pursuing Litigation Against Non-Signatory

By Beth Graham - April 8, 2011
The Northern District of Texas has held that a signatory to an arbitration agreement may enjoin another signatory from pursuing litigation against a non-signatory. In Salad Bowl Franchise Corp. v. Crane, No. 3:11-CV-0034-D (N.D. Tex., March 17, 2011), Salad Bowl, a Texas corporation with its principal offices in Dallas, entered into a franchise agreement which contained an arbitration clause with New Mexico residents Mason and Henry Crane (“the C

Continue reading...

Supreme Court of Texas Holds TAA Applies Where No Evidence to the Contrary Demonstrated

By Beth Graham - April 5, 2011
The Supreme Court of Texas has held in a per curiam opinion that the Texas General Arbitration Act (TAA) applied to a dispute where a party invoked the TAA in a hearing on a motion to compel arbitration and no evidence was offered to show the TAA did not apply despite that the motion itself failed to invoke the act. In Ellis v. Schlimmer, No. 10-0243 (Tex., April 1, 2011), Ron and Tana Schlimmer purchased a home in Corpus Christi, TX from Veronic

Continue reading...

Texas Supreme Court Denies Cert. Where Agreement Required Arbitrator to be Saudi National or Muslim Foreigner

By Beth Graham - March 16, 2011
The Supreme Court of Texas has denied a party’s petition for a writ of mandamus after the Houston [1st] Court of Appeals held U.S. courts lacked authority to appoint an arbitration panel. In In re Aramco Services Co., No. 01-09-00624-CV, (Tex. App. – Houston [1st], March 19, 2010), DynCorp International, LLC and Aramco entered into a contract for a computer system which was to be manufactured in the U.S. and installed at Aramco’s offices in Saudi

Continue reading...

W. D. of Texas Holds Dell Arbitration Agreement Illusory and Unenforceable

By Beth Graham - February 15, 2011
The Western District of Texas has dismissed a case for lack of personal jurisdiction after holding an arbitration clause in a reseller agreement was illusory and unenforceable. In Dell Mktg., L.P. v. Incompass IT, Inc., No. A-10-CA-590-SS, (W.D. Tex., February 9, 2011), Incompass IT, Inc., a reseller of Dell Marketing, L.P. products, purchased items from Dell totaling more than $75,000 and allegedly failed to pay for the products. Dell sued Incom

Continue reading...

S.D. Texas Sends Case Removed Under 9 U.S.C. § 205 Back to State Court

By Beth Graham - January 26, 2011
The Southern District of Texas has remanded a case removed to federal district court pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 205 because the requirements for allowing a nonsignatory to compel arbitration with a signatory were not satisfied and no other basis for federal jurisdiction existed. In QPro Inc. v. RTD Quality Servs. United States, No. H-09-3904, (S.D. Tex. January 4, 2011), QPro Inc. (“QPro”), a Texas company that performs nondestructive testing and ins

Continue reading...

Fifth Circuit Holds Motion to Compel Arbitration Not Enough to Defeat Preliminary Injunction

By Beth Graham - January 5, 2011
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has held that a motion to compel arbitration did not defeat a federal district court’s preliminary injunction. In Janvey v. Alguire, et al., No. 10-10617, (5th Cir. December 15, 2010), the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed suit in U.S. district court against the Stanford Group and other related corporate entities (collectively Stanford) alleging that Stanford perpetrated a multi-billion-dollar Ponzi

Continue reading...

2010 Arbitration Case Law: Fifth Circuit

By Beth Graham - December 31, 2010
In 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided the following arbitration-related cases: In Hall-Williams v. Law Office of Paul C. Miniclier, PLC, No. 09-30113, (5th Cir., Jan. 13, 2010), the Fifth Circuit compelled arbitration of a fees dispute between a law firm and a former client. The court held the parties’ arbitration clause was enforceable notwithstanding termination of their services contract. (read more here) In

Continue reading...

Fifth Circuit Holds Arbitration Provision Illusory and Unenforceable

By Beth Graham - October 29, 2010
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has held in an unpublished opinion that an arbitration provision in a multilevel marketing program contract which could be amended at the sole discretion of one party and bound the other party “upon notice” was illusory and unenforceable. In Juan Torres v. S.G.E. Management, L.L.C., No. 09-20778, (5th Cir., October 5, 2010), Ignite operated as a subsidiary of a retail provider of electricity in Texas. Ignite rel

Continue reading...

Article | Arbitration-Related Litigation in Texas

By Beth Graham - October 13, 2010
Mark Trachtenberg and Christina Crozier from the Houston office of Haynes & Boone, L.L.P. recently published an interesting and useful article entitled “Arbitration-Related Litigation in Texas,” (29 Corporate Counsel Rev. 1 (2010)). The article discusses the effect of governing law on arbitration-related litigation, pre-arbitration litigation and post-arbitration litigation in the State of Texas. Here is an excerpt: Congress intended for arbi

Continue reading...

« First‹ Previous5678910111213Next ›Last »

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy