• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Soft Law in the Organization and General Conduct of Commercial Arbitration Proceedings

0
by Beth Graham

Thursday, Mar 13, 2014


Tweet

Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich, William H. Webster Chair in Dispute Resolution at Pepperdine University School of Law and Academic Director of the Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution, has written Soft Law in the Organization and General Conduct of Commercial Arbitration Proceedings, Chapter in, SOFT LAW IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION (forthcoming 2014); Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014/4.  In his publication, Professor Stipanowich examines non-binding international and other guidelines that are often used to influence and affect arbitral proceedings in the commercial realm.

Here is the abstract:

This commentary examines the growing use of Soft Law – non-binding guidelines that currently play an important role in organizing and conducting commercial arbitration proceedings. Standards such as the UNCITRAL Notes on Organizing Arbitral Proceedings, the ICC Techniques for Controlling Time and Costs in Arbitration, and the Protocols for Expeditious, Cost-Effective Commercial Arbitration have evolved from professional discourse regarding process management and more particular concerns about cost, delay and inefficiency in arbitration. Collectively, these guidelines reflect a growing recognition that deliberate and proactive effort by business users, counsel, arbitrators and provider institutions is critical to making the most of arbitration and counteracting recent trends. They influence the activities of business clients and counsel, arbitrators and arbitral institutions.

This and other publications authored by Professor Stipanowich may be downloaded free of charge from the Social Science Research Network.

Related Posts

  • Commercial Arbitration and Settlement: Empirical Insights into the Roles Arbitrators PlayCommercial Arbitration and Settlement: Empirical Insights into the Roles Arbitrators Play
  • Living the Dream of ADR: Reflections on Four Decades of the Quiet Revolution in Dispute ResolutionLiving the Dream of ADR: Reflections on Four Decades of the Quiet Revolution in Dispute Resolution
  • Exploring the Interplay between Mediation, Evaluation and Arbitration in Commercial CasesExploring the Interplay between Mediation, Evaluation and Arbitration in Commercial Cases
  • The International Evolution of Mediation: A Call for Dialogue and DeliberationThe International Evolution of Mediation: A Call for Dialogue and Deliberation
  • Part One:  Arbitration in EvolutionPart One: Arbitration in Evolution
  • Reflections on the State and Future of Commercial Arbitration: Challenges, Opportunities, ProposalsReflections on the State and Future of Commercial Arbitration: Challenges, Opportunities, Proposals

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy