• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


SEC Seeks Additional Public Comments Over Proposed Changes to Who May Serve as a FINRA Public Arbitrator

0
by Beth Graham

Thursday, Oct 02, 2014


Tweet

On October 1st, the nation’s Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reportedly extended its review of a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) proposal to revamp how public arbitrators are selected in disputes between brokerages and consumers. Currently, securities industry veterans may serve as a public arbitrator on a FINRA panel following a prescribed “cooling-off” period. The proposed “Order Instituting Proceedings to Determine Whether to Approve or Disapprove Proposed Rule Change Relating to Revisions to the Definitions of Non-Public Arbitrator and Public Arbitrator” would permanently exclude former industry employees from serving in such a capacity regardless of how long the individual was employed in the profession.

According SEC Release No. 34-73277,

Currently, FINRA Rule12100(p)of the Code of Arbitration Procedure for Customer Disputes (“Customer Code”) and FINRA Rule 13100(p)of the Code of Arbitration Procedure for Industry Disputes (“Industry Code”) (collectively, “Codes”) define the term “non-public arbitrator;” and FINRA Rule 12100(u) of the Customer Code and Rule 13100(u) of the Industry Code” define the term “public arbitrator.” In general, the Codes classify arbitrators as “non-public” or “public” based on their professional and personal affiliations. Individuals affiliated with the financial industry are typically considered “non-public arbitrators.” Individuals unaffiliated with the financial industry are typically considered “public arbitrators.”

FINRA is now proposing to amend the Codes to revise and reorganize the definitions of “non-public arbitrator” and “public arbitrator.” The amendments would, among other matters, provide that persons who worked in the financial industry for any duration during their careers would always be classified as non-public arbitrators. The amendments would also provide that persons who represent investors or the financial industry as a significant part of their business would also be classified as non-public arbitrators, but could become public arbitrators after a cooling-off period. The amendments would also reorganize the definitions to make it easier for arbitrator applicants and parties, among others, to determine the correct arbitrator classification.

After receiving more than 300 comments on the proposal, the SEC made the rare decision to extend the written public comment period until October 31st. The FINRA proposal may not become a final rule unless it is formally approved by the SEC.

Photo credit: Walter Rodriguez / Foter / CC BY-SA

Related Posts

  • SEC Seeks Comments on FINRA’s Arbitration Rule ChangeSEC Seeks Comments on FINRA’s Arbitration Rule Change
  • FINRA Board Approves New Rule for Selecting Arbitral PanelsFINRA Board Approves New Rule for Selecting Arbitral Panels
  • SEC Approves Rule Change to Raise the Cap for FINRA Simplified Arbitration ClaimsSEC Approves Rule Change to Raise the Cap for FINRA Simplified Arbitration Claims
  • SEC Commissioner Speaks on Mandatory ArbitrationSEC Commissioner Speaks on Mandatory Arbitration
  • SEC Approves Revised Discovery Guide for FINRA ArbitrationsSEC Approves Revised Discovery Guide for FINRA Arbitrations
  • SEC Approves FINRA Plan to Allow All-Public Arbitration PanelsSEC Approves FINRA Plan to Allow All-Public Arbitration Panels

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy