• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


SCOTX Grants Petition for Review of Individual Arbitration Order in Payday Lender Case

0
by Beth Graham

Monday, Jun 26, 2017


Tweet

The Supreme Court of Texas has granted a group of payday loan customers’ request to review a putative class action case after the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio ordered the customers to individually arbitrate their claims.  In Henry v. Cash Biz, LP, No. 16-0854, several customers filed a would-be collective action lawsuit against a payday lender, Cash Biz.  According to the customers’ complaint, Cash Biz filed various criminal complaints against its defaulting customers in violation of Texas law.

In response to the lawsuit, Cash Biz filed a motion to compel the customers’ claims to individual arbitration based on a credit service contract that each customer signed when securing a short-term loan. Although a Bexar County trial court declined to compel the dispute to arbitration, the Fourth District Court of Appeals reversed the lower court’s order.  Additional information about this case is available in a prior Disputing blog post.

The issues presented in a Petition for Review that was filed last October with the Texas Supreme Court are:

Issue 1: Majority opinion failed to apply abuse of discretion standard to trial court’s factual determination and failed to consider most of the evidence presented, without objection.

Issue 2: Majority opinion failed to apply FAA or federal law as required.

Issue 3: Petition for Review is necessary to correct split of authority.

On Friday, the Supreme Court of Texas granted the customers’ Petition for Review.  Oral argument has not yet been scheduled by the court.  Please stay tuned to Disputing for more on this case in the future!

Photo credit: Serfs UP ! Roger Sayles via Foter.com / CC BY-ND

Related Posts

  • SCOTX Holds Payday Lender Did Not Waive Right to ArbitrationSCOTX Holds Payday Lender Did Not Waive Right to Arbitration
  • SCOTX Will Not Consider Whether Arbitrator Exceeded Authority in Workplace Discrimination CaseSCOTX Will Not Consider Whether Arbitrator Exceeded Authority in Workplace Discrimination Case
  • Payday Loan Customers Ask Texas Supreme Court to Consider Individual Arbitration OrderPayday Loan Customers Ask Texas Supreme Court to Consider Individual Arbitration Order
  • SCOTX Will Not Consider $16 Million Arbitration Award Arising Out of Energy DisputeSCOTX Will Not Consider $16 Million Arbitration Award Arising Out of Energy Dispute
  • SCOTX Offers Significant Guidance Regarding Discovery of ESISCOTX Offers Significant Guidance Regarding Discovery of ESI
  • SCOTX Refuses to Reconsider Patent Company’s Request to Vacate Arbitrator’s $3 Million Legal Fees AwardSCOTX Refuses to Reconsider Patent Company’s Request to Vacate Arbitrator’s $3 Million Legal Fees Award

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy