• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


SCOTUS to Consider Enforceability of Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements

0
by Beth Graham

Tuesday, Feb 26, 2013


Tweet

Tomorrow, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in American Express Corp. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, et al. (No. 12-133). The appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addresses whether the Federal Arbitration Act allows a court to invalidate an arbitration agreement that does not permit class arbitration of a federal law claim.

In the case, a number of small businesses, including Italian Colors Restaurant, accuse American Express of violating federal anti-trust law because the company allegedly forced them to accept credit cards with high transaction and other fees in order to accept American Express as a customer payment option. Although each of the merchants reportedly agreed to arbitrate any dispute with the company and the parties’ arbitration agreement does not permit class arbitration, several class action lawsuits were eventually filed. In the class action lawsuits, the merchants argued that obtaining individual arbitral awards would be cost prohibitive and would effectively deny each company’s rights when compared with the potential for recovery.

In 2003, the class action cases were consolidated in the Southern District of New York. The district court reportedly ordered the disputes to bilateral arbitration. The merchants appealed the case to the Second Circuit. The Appeals Court overturned the lower court’s order by stating the class action waiver was unenforceable. In addition, the Second Circuit reconsidered and reaffirmed its own holding after the Supreme Court’s decision in both Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp. and AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion. Last May, the Second Circuit also denied a request for rehearing of the case en banc.

In the company’s appeal to the Supreme Court, American Express argues that the appellate court’s decision directly conflicts with the high court’s holding in Concepcion. In that case, the Supreme Court held a California law stating a class action waiver in an arbitration provision was unenforceable directly conflicted with the Federal Arbitration Act. In addition, American Express argues the Supreme Court previously considered and dismissed the merchants’ argument that a class arbitration waiver would make it impossible for them to vindicate their rights.

This case will be the third time in three years the high court has considered the scope of a class action waiver in an agreement to arbitrate. Stay tuned to Disputing for more about this fascinating case!

Related Posts

  • Arbitrating Antitrust Claims, Class Action Waivers and the ‘Effective Vindication’ RuleArbitrating Antitrust Claims, Class Action Waivers and the ‘Effective Vindication’ Rule
  • The Not-So-Effective Vindication DecisionThe Not-So-Effective Vindication Decision
  • Supreme Court Upholds Agreement That Bans Class Arbitration Despite CostsSupreme Court Upholds Agreement That Bans Class Arbitration Despite Costs
  • Oral Argument Transcripts Now Available for Amex v. Italian Colors RestaurantOral Argument Transcripts Now Available for Amex v. Italian Colors Restaurant
  • The Court’s 2012 Class Act: A Little Bit of This, a Little Bit of ThatThe Court’s 2012 Class Act: A Little Bit of This, a Little Bit of That
  • ‘Sticky’ Arbitration Clauses?: The Use of Arbitration Clauses after Concepcion and Amex‘Sticky’ Arbitration Clauses?: The Use of Arbitration Clauses after Concepcion and Amex

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy