• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


SCOTUS Asked to Resolve Circuit Split Over U.S. Discovery in Foreign Private Commercial Arbitrations

0
by Beth Graham

Wednesday, Dec 23, 2020


Tweet

The United States Supreme Court has reportedly been asked to resolve a circuit split over whether parties to a foreign commercial arbitration proceeding may seek discovery in the United States under 28 U.S.C. § 1782(a).  Under the law, evidence for use before a “foreign or international tribunal” may be obtained via the U.S. federal district courts.  The nation’s federal courts, however, are currently split regarding whether private commercial arbitration tribunals are included in the definition of “foreign or international tribunal.”  The Second, Fifth, and Seventh Circuit Courts of Appeal have ruled foreign commercial arbitration proceedings do not qualify as a “foreign or international tribunal,” while the Fourth and Sixth Circuits have held participants in such proceedings are permitted to seek discovery under the law.  The issue is currently being considered by the Third and Ninth Circuits as well.

Earlier this month, a petition for a writ of certiorari (20-794) was filed in Servotronics, Inc. v. Rolls-Royce PLC, No. 19-1847 (7th Cir. 2020).  In the case, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals denied a request for discovery under Section 1782 despite that only six months prior the Fourth Circuit permitted discovery in a nearly identical sister case, Servotronics, Inc. v. Boeing Co., No. 18-2454 (4th Cir. 2020).  It will be interesting to see whether the Supreme Court of the United States agrees to resolve the current split.

Please check back soon for any updates on this interesting case!

Photo by: John-Mark Smith on Unsplash

Related Posts

  • Big Day at the Texas Supreme CourtBig Day at the Texas Supreme Court
  • Texas County Establishes Voluntary Mediation Program Texas County Establishes Voluntary Mediation Program
  • UT Law to Host 11th Annual Symposium on Dispute Resolution on April 29, 2011UT Law to Host 11th Annual Symposium on Dispute Resolution on April 29, 2011
  • California Supreme Court Holds Attorney-Client Communications Related to Mediation Not DiscoverableCalifornia Supreme Court Holds Attorney-Client Communications Related to Mediation Not Discoverable
  • Online Dispute Resolution and New In-Person LocationsOnline Dispute Resolution and New In-Person Locations
  • Fifth Circuit Reverses in Part N.D. of Texas’ Order Compelling Arbitration in Health Plan Sales DisputeFifth Circuit Reverses in Part N.D. of Texas’ Order Compelling Arbitration in Health Plan Sales Dispute

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy