• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

0
by Kyle Bailey

Thursday, May 14, 2020


Tweet

Disputing is synthesizing guidance documents from the AAA, CIArb, CPR, Hogan Lovells, and the ICC, as well as the Seoul Protocol, to provide a comprehensive list of best practices for remote arbitration. Previous blog posts have covered best practices for selecting the technology required for a remote arbitration, and best practices to ensure the security and confidentiality of the proceeding.

Today’s post focuses on procedures for witness examination over video conference:

  • A witness does not need to be present at the same venue as the parties, but the chosen venue for the witness must meet the technology standards.
  • The video conferencing system must show a reasonable part of the room in which the witness is located, while maintaining a clear picture of the witness. The witness should be in view at all times and in particular, the witness’s face and hands should be clearly visible. The witness must not use a virtual background.
  • Counsel must ensure that all witnesses are familiar with the video conferencing platform prior to giving testimony by conducting a test session with each witness.
  • The tribunal should ensure that the witness’s setup is adequate and that the witness is sufficiently familiar with the technology.
  • The parties must ascertain whether the applicable law allows for oaths to be taken over video conference. If not, the parties must propose alternative methods to ensure the reliability of any testimony.
  • The witness shall identify anyone else in the room with the witness and certify that the witness is not receiving communication of any kind while giving testimony.
  • Witnesses must have full and fair access to any documentation relied on during direct or cross examination. A dedicated separate screen for sharing electronic documents with the witness is recommended. Where possible, hard copies should also be provided. If hard copies can be provided, the parties can seal the copies and require the witness to open the sealed documents for the first time on camera.
  • All documents should be made available electronically to the parties, tribunal, and witness through the use of a secure document sharing platform.

 

If you would like to discuss remote arbitration further, please contact Karl’s scheduling team at (512) 345-8537. Additional information on the procedures that Karl utilizes for online dispute resolution can be found here.

Photo by: Sam McGhee on Unsplash

Related Posts

  • Online Dispute Resolution and New In-Person LocationsOnline Dispute Resolution and New In-Person Locations
  • Informed Consent in Mediation: Promoting Pro Se Parties’ Informed Settlement Choice While Honoring the Mediator’s Ethical DutiesInformed Consent in Mediation: Promoting Pro Se Parties’ Informed Settlement Choice While Honoring the Mediator’s Ethical Duties
  • Friday, August 26, 2005Friday, August 26, 2005
  • Article | FINRA to Propose New Rule For All-Public Arbitration PanelsArticle | FINRA to Propose New Rule For All-Public Arbitration Panels
  • NJ Appeals Court Refuses to Enforce Nursing Home’s “Dense and Meandering” Arbitration ProvisionNJ Appeals Court Refuses to Enforce Nursing Home’s “Dense and Meandering” Arbitration Provision
  • 27th Annual Advanced Personal Injury Law Course 201127th Annual Advanced Personal Injury Law Course 2011

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Kyle Bailey

Kyle Bailey is a law clerk at Karl Bayer, Mediator, Arbitrator & Special Master. Kyle earned a J.D. from the University of Texas School of Law in 2020. Kyle received a B.S. from Rice University in 2015 where he studied computer science.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy