• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Regulating Forced Arbitration in Consumer Financial Services

0
by Beth Graham

Monday, Jun 20, 2016


Tweet

Professor Martha McCluskey, University at Buffalo Law School, State University of New York, Professor Thomas McGarity, University of Texas School of Law, Professor Sidney Shapiro, Wake Forest University School of Law, James Goodwin, Senior Policy Analyst at the Center for Progressive Reform, and Mollie Rosenzweig, Policy Analyst at the Center for Progressive Reform, have published a timely report entitled, “Regulating Forced Arbitration in Consumer Financial Services: Re-Opening the Courthouse Doors to Victimized Consumers.”  In their publication, the authors examine the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s recent proposal to limit the use of mandatory arbitration clauses in certain consumer contracts.

Here is the abstract:

Forced arbitration clauses have become almost unavoidable in contracts for financial services and products ranging from credit cards to private student loans. This report examines how the financial services industry uses these clauses to defeat consumers’ rights and evade accountability for their wrongdoing.

As the report explains, the forced arbitration process harms consumers by relegating them from the civil justice system to an inferior forum for vindicating their rights. In contrast to the courts, forced arbitration tends to be secretive, less independent of industry, more prone to erroneous and arbitrary rulings, more likely to discourage the pursuit of claims with procedural barriers, and more likely to provide inadequate relief for compensating victims of corporate wrongdoing.

The report examines the 2016 proposal by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to limit the use of forced arbitration clauses in contracts for financial services and products, and finds that the proposal is consistent with the agency’s statutory obligation to protect consumers. The report goes on to explain that the CFPB would better fulfill its statutory mandate by revising its proposal to include stronger protections for consumers.

This and a number of other research papers written by the authors may be downloaded free of charge from the Social Science Research Network.

What do you think of the CFPB’s proposal?  We would love to hear your thoughts.

Photo credit: j3net via Foter.com / CC BY

Related Posts

  • CFPB Director Pens NYT Op-Ed Addressing New Rule Against Mandatory Arbitration Agreements that Ban Class-ActionsCFPB Director Pens NYT Op-Ed Addressing New Rule Against Mandatory Arbitration Agreements that Ban Class-Actions
  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Proposal Would Ban Mandatory Arbitration Provisions in Most Financial ContractsConsumer Financial Protection Bureau Proposal Would Ban Mandatory Arbitration Provisions in Most Financial Contracts
  • Consumer Financing Pre-Dispute Mandatory Arbitration: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Developments Consumer Financing Pre-Dispute Mandatory Arbitration: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Developments
  • CFPB Director Pens Letter Urging President to Veto Measure Rescinding New Arbitration RuleCFPB Director Pens Letter Urging President to Veto Measure Rescinding New Arbitration Rule
  • Senate Narrowly Votes to Rescind New CFPB Arbitration RuleSenate Narrowly Votes to Rescind New CFPB Arbitration Rule
  • Lawsuit Seeks to Halt CPFB Rule Against Mandatory Arbitration Agreements that Ban Class-ActionsLawsuit Seeks to Halt CPFB Rule Against Mandatory Arbitration Agreements that Ban Class-Actions

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy