• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Part III: State of the Judiciary

0
by Karl Bayer

Thursday, Jun 06, 2013


Tweet

On March 6th, Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Wallace B. Jefferson presented his State of the Judiciary speech before the 83rd Texas Legislature. Due to the length of the speech, Disputing published the speech in three parts.

Here is Part III:

Juvenile Justice

Now, if antiquity is the root of our paper problem, modernity is the curse of our juvenile justice system. In modern times, we have elected to give our children tickets for the kind of misbehavior that, in the old days, landed you and me in the principal’s office. Class C misdemeanor tickets for “disruptive” school conduct. The child must appear in court to answer the charges. She has no right to counsel and no guarantee that her record will be sealed. Cash-strapped families forego representation, often with devastating consequences, like arrest warrants and criminal records. An estimated 300,000misdemeanor tickets are issued in our state’s schools each year. We are criminalizing our children for non-violent offenses. Students receiving these tickets are stigmatized. They often miss class or drop out of school altogether. We must keep our children in school, and out of our courts, to give them the opportunity to follow a path of success, not a path towards prison.

Senator Whitmire leads in this area, not just in Texas, but nationally. He and Senator West have joined forces this session to address some of these issues. They both understand that we must work together –legislators, judges, educators, law enforcement officers, and others–to address misbehavior in our schools, promote good behavior, maintain the safety of our students, increase graduation rates, decrease students’ exposure to the court system, refer students to proper community and mental-health resources when needed, and apply these policies consistently across schools and student bodies.

Guardianship

After “liberty and justice for all,” one of the most revered phrases I know is “honor thy father and mother.” I am incredibly fortunate to have both my mother and father here with me today, and two of my siblings, Leah and Lamont, who love and care for them in San Antonio. But for each member of the greatest generation that has the tender care of family, there is an elderly citizen for whom Texas provides few protections from abuse.

The population over age 65 in this state will increase by almost 50% by 2020 and will more than double by 2040. Many of those individuals will need help managing their affairs –some through the appointment of a guardian. But Texas currently has only 368 state-certified guardians who handle only 5,000 of the 40,000 pending guardianships. Families, friends, and attorneys serve as guardians in the remaining cases. Only ten of our 254 counties have probate courts with resources to adequately prevent abuse. An exploding elderly population will stress the guardianship system. We must begin to address these issues and prepare.

For this reason, I am today announcing the creation of a special committee of the Texas Judicial Council whose sole mission will be to honor our mothers and fathers. The committee will make recommendations to ensure their safety and financial security, and I hope you will all support the effort.

Conclusion

We must provide legal aid for the poor, modernize our system for the middle class, build a sane disciplinary regime for our children, protect our parents. We should do one more thing. Discard our broken system in which judges of enormous talent are removed from office not for ineptitude, but only because they happen to be a member of the wrong political party when partisan winds shift. All of these reforms are encompassed in the judiciary’s obligation to provide access to justice. That phrase is often thought of in terms of providing legal services to the poor. It is that, to be sure, but an accessible justice system requires that even broader segments of our society be able to utilize it. Viewed this way, our remedies must be more expansive as well. Just as no single defect created the barriers, there is no unitary solution. So we must marshal all of our forces.

On February 24, 1836, Texas forces were under siege from the Mexican army at the battle of the Alamo. William Barret Travis, the commander of the Texian soldiers, sent a desperate plea for help. Addressed to “the People of Texas & All Americans in the World,” he asked “in the name of Liberty, of patriotism & everything dear to the American character, to come to our aid, with all dispatch.” He vowed never to surrender or retreat, promising “victory or death.” His fate was sealed March 6th, exactly 177 years ago.

We are at a crossroads177 years later. Addressing the challenges in our justice system requires a fundamental shift in thinking. Our courts are the final line of protection for individual rights. They provide access to justice, protect us from abuses of power by corporations or the government; they protect our most basic constitutional rights. But the courts must, themselves, reform. We need to change the way we do business to better meet the needs of citizens and employers across our state. That’s why we are investing in technology to save taxpayers money and to provide better customer service to those who come to us for justice.

My presentation today is not a State of the Judiciary. It is a call to arms. “[I]n the name of Liberty, of patriotism & everything dear to the American character,” Commander Travis urged Texans to act with dispatch. Today, let’s marshal our forces to confront our challenges so that we can better serve the people. We may not win the entire battle today. But, as we Texans like to say, remember the Alamo!

The Chief Justice’s entire State of the Judiciary speech may be viewed at Texas Courts Online.

Related Posts

  • The Impact of Chief Justice Jefferson’s State of the Judiciary SpeechThe Impact of Chief Justice Jefferson’s State of the Judiciary Speech
  • Part II:  State of the JudiciaryPart II: State of the Judiciary
  • Part I:  State of the JudiciaryPart I: State of the Judiciary
  • Texas 83rd Legislative Session BeginsTexas 83rd Legislative Session Begins
  • Texas Supreme Court Rules on Appellate Court Jurisdiction Over Order Confirming Arbitration Award in Part and Vacating the Award in PartTexas Supreme Court Rules on Appellate Court Jurisdiction Over Order Confirming Arbitration Award in Part and Vacating the Award in Part
  • GUEST-POST | 2010 U.S. Supreme Court and Fifth Circuit Activity ReportsGUEST-POST | 2010 U.S. Supreme Court and Fifth Circuit Activity Reports

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Karl Bayer

Karl Bayer is an ADR practitioner with almost thirty years of of experience in litigation, mediation, and arbitration. A long-time successful trial lawyer, Karl recognized early the opportunities which ADR provided to the world of litigation and began to explore the potential of his mediation practice. As he had already earned the respect and trust of both the plaintiffs' and the defense bars, he filled a niche in Austin as a mediator who is requested by both sides of most disputes. He has spoken extensively about ADR and technical topics, both at CLE presentations and as an adjunct professor at The University of Texas School of Law.

Karl also serves frequently as a pre-trial special master in federal district courts in Texas. While this service is often in the capacity of a Markman Master in patent infringement cases, he also serves as a general pre-trial master assisting judges and litigants as they wade through discovery and other pretrial procedural disputes.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy