• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


  • We’re Back!!!!
    Well, it’s been a while since we published and that is about to change.   Since I spent much of last year becoming
  • JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
    JAMS, the world’s largest private alternative dispute resolution (ADR) provider, is pleased to announce that Karl Bayer
  • Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
    Linda S. Mullenix, Morris & Rita Atlas Chair in Advocacy at the University of Texas School of Law, has written “Class Ac
  • Picking the Proper Technological Tool for Problem-Solving in Arbitration
    Professor Amy J. Schmitz, John Deaver Drinko-Baker & Hostetler Chair in Law and Co-Director of the Translational Data An

Recent Posts

SCOTX Affirms Arbitration Award, Finds No Manifest Disregard of the Law in Oil & Gas Dispute

By Beth Graham - April 28, 2017

The Supreme Court of Texas has affirmed a court of appeals’ judgment regarding an arbitration panel’s damages award in an oil and gas exploration and production dispute.

Continue reading...

The Agreement to Arbitrate and the ‘Applicable Law’

By Beth Graham - April 25, 2017

Alan S. Rau, Mark G. and Judy G. Yudof Chair of Law at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law, has published “The Agreement to Arbitrate and the ‘Applicable Law’,” American Review of International Arbitration (Forthcoming); U. of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 644.

Continue reading...

California Supreme Court Invalidates Citibank Arbitration Provision Requiring Waiver of Right to Seek Public Injunctive Relief

By Beth Graham - April 24, 2017

The Supreme Court of California has ruled a predispute arbitration provision that requires a consumer to waive the right to seek public injunctive relief is unenforceable.

Continue reading...

Clear Statement Rules and the Integrity of Labor Arbitration

By Beth Graham - April 18, 2017

Professor Stephen F. Ross, Lewis H. Vovakis Distinguished Faculty Scholar and Director of the Penn State Institute for Sports Law, Policy, and Research at Penn State Law, and Roy Eisnehardt, Lecturer in Sports Law at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, have published “Clear Statement Rules and the Integrity of Labor Arbitration,” Penn State Law Research Paper No. 6-2017; Arbitration Law Review, Forthcoming.

Continue reading...
« First‹ Previous899091929394959697Next ›Last »

Arbitration

Online Arbitration as a Remedy for Crowdfunding Fraud

By Beth Graham - August 21, 2017

C. Steven Bradford, Henry M. Grether, Jr. Professor of Law at the University of Nebraska College of Law, has published “Online Arbitration as a Remedy for Crowdfunding Fraud,” Florida State University Law Review, Forthcoming.

Continue reading...

SCOTUS Asked to Consider Order Denying Arbitration in Texas Ponzi Scheme Case

By Beth Graham - August 17, 2017

NLRB Files Responsive Brief in Murphy Oil Case

By Beth Graham - August 16, 2017

Mediation

Medical Staff Standard Includes Conflict Resolution Requirement

By Holly Hayes - April 9, 2010

By Holly Hayes The Joint Commission Medical Staff Standard MS.01.01.01 has been approved and will go into effect March 31, 2011. See the Standard here. American Medical News summarizes: “The new standard states that the organized medical staff has the primary job of assuring quality and patient safety in the hospital while laying out a mechanism for physicians, the hospital governing body and chief executive to resolve differences over rules, policies and procedures. By spelling out these respective roles and responsibilities, the standard aims to foster collaborative working relationships to improve the quality of care. Medical staffs around the country will have to revise their bylaws in the next year to comply with the standard.” Read more here. With regard to the management of conflict, The Joint Commission introduction to the new standard states: “If conflict arises within the medical staff regarding medical staff bylaws, rules and regulations, or policies, it implements its process for managing internal conflict (see Element of Performance 10 — see below). If conflicts regarding the medical staff bylaws, rules and regulations, or policies arise between the governing body and the organized medical staff, the organization implements its conflict management processes, as set forth in the Leadership chapter.” Element of Performance 10 states: “The organized medical staff has a process which is implemented to manage conflict between the medical staff and the medical executive committee on issues including, but not limited to, proposals to adopt a rule, regulation, or policy or an amendment thereto. Nothing in the foregoing is intended to prevent medical staff members from communicating with the governing body on a rule, regulation, or policy adopted by the organized medical staff or the medical executive committee. The governing body determines the method of communication.” The Joint Commission recognition of the value of teamwork in the medical setting and the mandate for the development of a conflict resolution process is summarized as follows: “This collaborative relationship is critical to providing safe, high quality care in the hospital. While the governing body is ultimately responsible for the quality and safety of care at the hospital, the governing body, medical staff, and administration collaborate to provide safe, quality care. (Please see the Leadership chapter for more discussion of the relationship among the organized medical staff, administration, and governing body.)” See our posts on the Leadership chapter here and here. The requirement that “The organized medical staff has a process which is implemented to manage conflict…” validates the use of ADR techniques in health care. We welcome your comments to this new medical staff standard. Holly Hayes is a mediator at Karl Bayer, Dispute Resolution Expert where she focuses on mediation of health care disputes. Holly holds a B.A. from Southern Methodist University and a Masters in Health Administration from Duke University. She can be reached at: holly@karlbayer.com.

Continue reading...

ABA 2010 Winners of Mediation Video Contest on YouTube: Honorable Mention (2)

By Victoria VanBuren - April 5, 2010

Where Does ADR Fit in Health Care?

By Holly Hayes - April 1, 2010

Healthcare Disputes

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.


About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy