• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


  • We’re Back!!!!
    Well, it’s been a while since we published and that is about to change.   Since I spent much of last year becoming
  • JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
    JAMS, the world’s largest private alternative dispute resolution (ADR) provider, is pleased to announce that Karl Bayer
  • Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
    Linda S. Mullenix, Morris & Rita Atlas Chair in Advocacy at the University of Texas School of Law, has written “Class Ac
  • Picking the Proper Technological Tool for Problem-Solving in Arbitration
    Professor Amy J. Schmitz, John Deaver Drinko-Baker & Hostetler Chair in Law and Co-Director of the Translational Data An

Recent Posts

Confidentiality in Patent Dispute Resolution: Antitrust Implications

By Beth Graham - September 8, 2017

Professor Mark R. Patterson, Fordham University School of Law, has published “Confidentiality in Patent Dispute Resolution: Antitrust Implications,” Washington Law Review, Forthcoming; Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3026369.

Continue reading...

Fifth Circuit Affirms Order Stating Question of Arbitrability Was Delegated to the Arbitrator in $1.6 Billion Oil Lease Dispute

By Beth Graham - August 31, 2017

The nation’s Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a federal district court’s order stating a $1.6 billion fraud lawsuit must be arbitrated.

Continue reading...

Fort Worth COA Rules Church Must Arbitrate Claims Against Roofing Materials Manufacturer

By Beth Graham - August 30, 2017

Texas’s Second District Court of Appeals in Fort Worth has overturned a trial court’s order denying a company’s motion to compel arbitration.

Continue reading...

Evolution of the Arbitration Forum as a Response to Mandatory Arbitration

By Beth Graham - August 29, 2017

Teresa J. Verges, Lecturer in Law and Director of the University of Miami School of Law Investor Rights Clinic, has published “Evolution of the Arbitration Forum as a Response to Mandatory Arbitration,” Nevada Law Journal, Forthcoming.

Continue reading...
« First‹ Previous777879808182838485Next ›Last »

Arbitration

Proposed Senate Bill Would Void Workplace Sexual Harassment Arbitration Provisions

By Beth Graham - December 19, 2017

Earlier this month, United States Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Lindsey Graham introduced bipartisan legislation that would prohibit employers from requiring workers who suffer sexual harassment to arbitrate their claims. 

Continue reading...

Wisconsin Federal Court Confirms Class Arbitration Award Ahead of SCOTUS Decision

By Beth Graham - December 11, 2017

User Concerns About Reinsurance Arbitration – And Attendant Lessons for Selection of Dispute Resolution Forums and Methods

By Beth Graham - December 6, 2017

Mediation

Guide for Negotiating an Electronic Health Record (EHR) Contract

By Holly Hayes - November 5, 2010

by Holly Hayes Physician News Digest posted a beginner’s guide to negotiating an Electronic Health Record (EHR) software license agreement. EHR contracts are similar to other software license agreements, but issues specific to health care, including provisions related to HIPAA and “meaningful use” provisions, need to be addressed. The guide focuses on five key areas of a software license agreement (SLA): User license Implementation Service obligation Hardware and interfaces HITECH Act clauses User License — We begin our tutorial with the user license for one main reason: you will almost always be able to negotiate licensing costs. In enterprise software negotiations, some vendors offer as much as a 20% baseline discount (source). Small practices likely won’t come close to this level of discount, but it gives you an idea of how much room you may have to bargain. Before talking about price, you’ll need to define “user.” An EHR license agreement is unique in that a single user license may include multiple employees. For example, a user license for one MD may include mid-level providers (nurses and physician’s assistants), as well as administrative staff. Alternatively, you might use a tiered pricing structure with one high cost for MDs, a lower cost for mid-level providers and an even lower cost for administrative staff. Finally, “site” and enterprise licenses exist for large medical facilities and hospitals. After defining “user,” several questions still need to be addressed. Is there a limitation on how many computers the software can be installed on? Can it be used at multiple offices? Can the license be sold or transferred if the practice is sold or merges with another company? It is important to anticipate possible scenarios of how, where and who will access the software, then address these in the contract. Implementation — Not all software vendors offer implementation services – some rely on a network of value added resellers (VARs) to provide implementation services – but it is still worth discussing here because of the high costs. For every dollar the EHR costs, you can expect to pay at least one dollar for implementation services. In larger offices or more complex environments, this ratio can be even higher; a two-to-one or even five-to-one ratio is not uncommon. Implementation costs are based off hourly rates and an estimate of hours to complete the setup. It can also be based on monthly rates, which is sometimes cheaper. In some cases, the vendor will provide a fixed cost, but that is less common. Regardless, it is important to settle on implementation expenses in the initial agreement. You’ll have the most leverage during the negotiation process and prices will likely go up after you are in a contract. After negotiating costs, you’ll need to agree on the details of the implementation process. For example, who will be responsible for transferring data into the new EHR? Will you be transferring data from another system or from paper records? What are the costs? You should also develop an implementation timeline, determine what kind of strategy you’ll pursue (e.g. “phased rollout”) and decide which implementation activities the vendor will be responsible for. Poor planning is a leading cause of failed software implementations, so be prepared. Ongoing Service Obligations — Next, we address the service obligations, or support, updates and maintenance. Depending on the length of your contract, the service agreement will be the second or largest expense of your EHR software purchase. It is not uncommon for maintenance and support to be as much as 20% to 30% of the original software purchase price. Each part of the service section deserves attention. Here are a few key considerations to begin with: Support – What hours of support will be available? Does it include telephone support, in-person technical support, or both? What happens if the EHR vendor doesn’t meet the support requirements? Will the contract include a clause for negligence of support and require vendors to face a penalty – either monetary or other? Updates – How often will updates be rolled out? Are you required to install all updates? Keep in mind, changes to the functionality of the EHR could affect your workflow and office efficiency. Maintenance – What new software releases are included in the maintenance agreement; for example, does the agreement just include patches for bugs, are are new functional capabilities included? How are the maintenance fees calculated? Training – How many hours are included? What does it cost if you exceed the specified hours? Who will be trained and where will they be trained? Will you be charged for travel-related expenses for on-location training? Hardware and Interfaces — Next, on to hardware. In addition to discussing hardware with your EHR vendor, be sure to compare prices from third party vendors. You should be able to get hardware specifications from your vendor’s website or just by request. You can then use this information to get price quotes from other hardware vendors. You might find a better price elsewhere or just have extra leverage when it comes time to negotiate with the EHR vendor. Conversely, the integration or interfacing of devices is better left to the EHR vendor. This can include everything from scanners and faxes to more complex devices like laboratory information systems and electrocardiogram (ECC/EKG) equipment. Make sure your agreement clearly identifies who will provide ongoing support for interfaces. You don’t want to get stranded if both the EHR vendor and device manufacturer claim the other should provide support. HITECH Act Clauses — Several EHR software vendors have started adding provisions for the HITECH Act into their license agreements. As details about “meaningful use” and “certified technology” are revealed every few months, it’s important to make sure this section is up to date. Additionally, with thousands of dollars at stake, it’s important to identify any ambiguities. What happens if you fail to achieve meaningful use? Do you receive a reimbursement covering the full amount of Stimulus Bill incentives? Or are you only reimbursed for the cost of the software? Ultimately […]

Continue reading...

Special Master Appointed to Conduct Global Mediation in Bankruptcy Case

By Beth Graham - November 2, 2010

Communication Skills Key in Ambulatory Surgery Centers

By Holly Hayes - October 27, 2010

Healthcare Disputes

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.


About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy