Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog

We’re Back!!!!
Well, it’s been a while since we published and that is about to change. Since I spent much of last year becoming
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS, the world’s largest private alternative dispute resolution (ADR) provider, is pleased to announce that Karl Bayer
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Linda S. Mullenix, Morris & Rita Atlas Chair in Advocacy at the University of Texas School of Law, has written “Class Ac
Picking the Proper Technological Tool for Problem-Solving in Arbitration
Professor Amy J. Schmitz, John Deaver Drinko-Baker & Hostetler Chair in Law and Co-Director of the Translational Data An

Wednesday, August 24, 2005

By Rob Hargrove - August 24, 2005

Today, the Third Court of Appeals reversed a default judgment against a Texan who argued in a restricted appeal that he was not properly served with process. The opinion, which is actually fascinating for us nerds, does a good job of describing both restricted appeals and the ins and out of substituted service under Texas law. Cause No. 03-04-00244-CV Technorati Tags: litigation, Third Court of Appeals, law