• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


  • We’re Back!!!!
    Well, it’s been a while since we published and that is about to change.   Since I spent much of last year becoming
  • JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
    JAMS, the world’s largest private alternative dispute resolution (ADR) provider, is pleased to announce that Karl Bayer
  • Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
    Linda S. Mullenix, Morris & Rita Atlas Chair in Advocacy at the University of Texas School of Law, has written “Class Ac
  • Picking the Proper Technological Tool for Problem-Solving in Arbitration
    Professor Amy J. Schmitz, John Deaver Drinko-Baker & Hostetler Chair in Law and Co-Director of the Translational Data An

Recent Posts

Ninth Circuit Finds Class Action Waiver Unconscionable

By Victoria VanBuren - March 31, 2009

In Chalk v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., No. 06-35909 (9th Cir. Mar. 27, 2009), the issue before the Ninth Circuit is whether a class action waiver in an agreement between T-Mobile and its customers is unconscionable under Oregon law. Steward and Chalk (plaintiffs) bought from T-Mobile a PC card manufactured by Sony. The card enables computers to connect wirelessly to the Internet. By signing the one-year service agreement with T-Mobile, the plaintiffs acknowledged that the agreement: REQUIRES MANDATORY ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES; REQUIRES MANDATORY WAIVER OF THE RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL AND WAIVER OF ANY ABILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN CLASS ACTION; The Terms and Conditions instructs purchasers to refrain from using the service should the purchaser disagree with the terms. It also provides for mandatory arbitration of all claims by the American Arbitration Association and states that each party agrees to pay its “own other fees, costs and expenses including those for counsel, experts, and witnesses.” Plaintiffs were not able to make the card to function properly, and after contacting Sony and T-Mobile several times without success, plaintiffs filed a class action suit. Plaintiffs alleged violation of federal and state law and alleged that the defendants knew or should have known that the card was not compatible. Defendants filed a motion to compel arbitration citing the arbitration clause and the district court granted it. The Ninth Circuit reviewed the validity of the agreement under Oregon law, in particular, the plaintiffs’ allegations of unconscionability: Procedural unconscionability: “oppression” and “surprise.” Here, the court agreed with the district court and held that the “take-it -or-leave-it” nature of the contract was not procedural unconscionable. Substantive unconscionability. The court analyzed whether the terms of the agreement are “unfairly one-sided.” It held that the class action waiver is substantively unconscionable and unenforceable. The court based its finding in two reasons: (a) the waiver is inherently one-sided when contained in a consumer contract and (b) it prevents individuals from vindicating their rights. Technorati Tags: arbitration, ADR, law, class action waiver, unconscionability, consumer arbitration agreement

Continue reading...

Texas Bill: Victim-Offender Mediation Program

By Victoria VanBuren - March 30, 2009

A recent bill related to ADR has been filed by the 81st Texas Legislature. H.B. 2139, authored by Rep. McClendon, would establish a victim-offender pretrial mediation program for first time offenders. Status: Left pending in committee on 03/19/2009. Technorati Tags: arbitration, ADR, law, Mediation,

Continue reading...

ABA Spring 2009 Conference

By Victoria VanBuren - March 27, 2009

Need CLE credits? The Dispute Resolution Section of the ABA will be hosting its 11th Annual Spring Conference next month. The Conference brochure is here and online registration is here.

Continue reading...

Federal Legislation on Alternative Dispute Resolution

By Victoria VanBuren - March 26, 2009

The following bills related to Alternative Dispute Resolution have been introduced recently by the 111st. Congress. H.R. 1214. Filed by Rep. Gutierrez, (D-IL) this bill, titled “Payday Loan Reform Act of 2009,” would amend the Truth in Lending Act to establish additional payday loan requirements to protect consumers. This bill, among other things, prohibits a mandatory arbitration clause that is “oppressive, unfair, unconscionable, or substantially in derogation of the rights of consumers.” Status: referred to the house Committee on Financial Services on 02/26/2009. S. 512. Filed by Sen. Martinez (R-FL) this bill, titled “Fairness in Nursing Home Arbitration Act of 2009,” would prohibit arbitration agreements in nursing home contracts. Status: referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary on 03/03/2009. S. 560. Filed by Sen. Kennedy (D-MA), this bill, titled “Employee Free Choice Act of 2009,” would amend the National Labor Relations Act to require first mediation and then binding arbitration if both parties are unable to reach an agreement within certain time frame. Status: referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions on 03/10/2009. H.R. 1409. Filed by Rep. Miller (D-CA), this bill is similar to S. 560. Status: referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor on 03/10/2009. Technorati Tags: arbitration, ADR, law, Payday Loan Reform Act of 2009, Fairness in Nursing Home Arbitration Act of 2009, Employee Free Choice Act of 2009

Continue reading...
« First‹ Previous487488489490491492493494495Next ›Last »

Arbitration

Mediation


Healthcare Disputes

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.


About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy