• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


  • We’re Back!!!!
    Well, it’s been a while since we published and that is about to change.   Since I spent much of last year becoming
  • JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
    JAMS, the world’s largest private alternative dispute resolution (ADR) provider, is pleased to announce that Karl Bayer
  • Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
    Linda S. Mullenix, Morris & Rita Atlas Chair in Advocacy at the University of Texas School of Law, has written “Class Ac
  • Picking the Proper Technological Tool for Problem-Solving in Arbitration
    Professor Amy J. Schmitz, John Deaver Drinko-Baker & Hostetler Chair in Law and Co-Director of the Translational Data An

Recent Posts

UNCITRAL Issues Report Related to Expedited Arbitration

By Beth Graham - May 28, 2019

The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (“UNCITRAL”), has issued its “Report of Working Group II (Dispute Settlement) on the work of its sixty-ninth session (New York, 4–8 February 2019).” 

Continue reading...

Chinese Universities Lead the World in AI-Related Patent Applications and Research Publications

By Nate Legum - May 23, 2019

In recent years, research into artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed multiple fields including visual perception and speech recognition. The International Data Corporation (IDC) estimates that worldwide spending on AI systems totaled $19.1 billion in 2018. 

Continue reading...

Mandatory Arbitration and the Market for Reputation

By Beth Graham - May 16, 2019

Dr. Roy Shapira, Stigler Center, University of Chicago Booth School of Business Fellow and Radzyner Law School, Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) faculty member, has published “Mandatory Arbitration and the Market for Reputation,” Boston University Law Review, Vol. 99 (forthcoming). 

Continue reading...

LA Court Overturns Arbitrator’s Punitive Damages Award Against Fox Entertainment

By Nate Legum - May 14, 2019

A Los Angeles Superior Court judge has overturned an arbitrator’s $128 million punitive damages award that was issued against Fox Entertainment over a profit participation scheme involving its long-running television series “Bones,” while leaving a $50 million non-punitive damages award in place.

Continue reading...
« First‹ Previous333435363738394041Next ›Last »

Arbitration

Mandatory Arbitration and the Market for Reputation

By Beth Graham - May 16, 2019

Dr. Roy Shapira, Stigler Center, University of Chicago Booth School of Business Fellow and Radzyner Law School, Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) faculty member, has published “Mandatory Arbitration and the Market for Reputation,” Boston University Law Review, Vol. 99 (forthcoming). 

Continue reading...

LA Court Overturns Arbitrator’s Punitive Damages Award Against Fox Entertainment

By Nate Legum - May 14, 2019

Everyone Can Be a Winner in Baseball Arbitration

By Beth Graham - May 6, 2019

Mediation

A Short & Happy Guide to Mediation

By Beth Graham - March 31, 2014

Disputing would like to congratulate Dallas alternative dispute resolution professional Will Pryor on the publication of his new book, A Short & Happy Guide to Mediation.

Continue reading...

Ohio Supreme Court Orders Jock Tax Dispute to Mediation

By Beth Graham - March 18, 2014

Protecting Confidential Information in Commercial Mediations

By Beth Graham - March 10, 2014

Healthcare Disputes

Elements of the Accountable Care Organization (ACO)

By Holly Hayes - January 13, 2012

By Holly Hayes Marc Bard, MD and Mike Nugent, authors of “Accountable Care Organization, Your Guide to Strategy, Design and Implementation” provide a list of elements common to most ACOs. As described in our previous post , there is still a great deal of ambiguity about the definition of an ACO. The American Hospital Association (AHA) has developed a list of key questions (see below) to ask in the development of an ACO. Bard and Nugent provide this set of attributes that will be common to most ACOs: Effective, collaborative, enlightened leadership made up of both physicians and professional administrators A culture that supports clinical and operational integration, care redesign, operating efficiency, innovation, and systemness A medical home model for primary care providers able to provide care management, coordination, integration, and patient navigation Comprehensive patient registries to identify high-risk patients and offer services to mitigate risk A broad array of clinical specialists within or in relationship with the ACO One or more acute care hospitals, including associated ambulatory care sites, even though this is not required in the legislation Affiliations, partnerships, joint ventures, or joint operating agreements with subacute care facilities with well-developed management that links and coordinates care across settings Medical risk-management functions that have previously been the purview of payers Supportive compensation, incentive, and reward systems that align with what the market values and is willing to pay for Systems and processes to encourage, manage, and reward patient “stickiness” – the propensity of patients to choose to say within the system for all their care. The AHA in their June 2010 Accountable Care Organizations AHA Research Synthesis Report list the following key questions to consider in the development and implementation of an ACO: What are the key competencies required of ACOs? How will ACOs address physician barriers to integration? What are the legal and regulatory barriers to effective ACO implementation? How can ACOs maintain patient satisfaction and engagement? How will quality benchmarks be established? How will savings be shared among ACOs? Future posts on the development of the ACO will examine the relationships between physicians and other physicians and hospitals and physicians in the development of a successful ACO. We welcome your comments. Technorati Tags: Healthcare Holly Hayes is a mediator at Karl Bayer, Dispute Resolution Expert where she focuses on mediation of health care disputes. Holly holds a B.A. from Southern Methodist University and a Masters in Health Administration from Duke University. She can be reached at holly@karlbayer.com.

Continue reading...

What is an Accountable Care Organization (ACO)?

By Holly Hayes - December 30, 2011

By Holly Hayes A Wall Street Journal article from last week, titled “The Future of U.S. Health Care”, asks in the subtitle: “What is a Hospital? An Insurer? Even a Doctor? All the Lines in the Industry are Starting to Blur”. The same questions apply to the development of the Accountable Care Organization (ACO). Marc Bard and Mike Nugent provide some comprehensive answers about ACOs in their book: “Accountable Care Organizations, Your Guide to Strategy, Design, and Implementation”. Although only four pages of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA) address the development and deployment of the ACO, no other aspect of the PPACA, with the exception of Medicare rate regulation has received as much attention as the ACO. Bard and Nugent describe four perspectives in the health care industry on the intent of ACOs: Those passionate about clinical quality improvement see the ACO as a means to achieve their goals. Those driven by the need for greater efficiency and cost management see the ACO as a potential pathway to that end. Those seeking improvements in population management see the ACO as a potential step in the right direction. Those focused on physician development and alignment see the ACO as an opportunity to achieve those goals. The successful implementation of an ACO must integrate all four perspectives. The authors state, “In brief, the ACO is not really an entity as much as it is a contractual relationship that consists of delivery and financing tactics between an organized healthcare delivery system and CMS or another payer to provide measurably high quality care efficiently and to share the benefits of efficient delivery with CMS (and possibly with patients)”. How those “contractural relationships” are developed will predict the success of the ACO model. We welcome your thoughts on building healthy relationships as part of a successful ACO. Technorati Tags: Healthcare Holly Hayes is a mediator at Karl Bayer, Dispute Resolution Expert where she focuses on mediation of health care disputes. Holly holds a B.A. from Southern Methodist University and a Masters in Health Administration from Duke University. She can be reached at holly@karlbayer.com.

Continue reading...
« First‹ Previous333435363738394041Next ›Last »

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.


About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy