Have you heard? Karl Bayer’s Disputing Blog recently unveiled a new look.

A petition for certiorari in an arbitration case that was decided earlier this year by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals is currently being considered by the United States Supreme Court. In Bakoss v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, No. 12-1429, the appeals court held that the meaning of the term “arbitration” under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) was defined by federal common law.

In March, Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Wallace B. Jefferson presented his State of the Judiciary speech before the 83rd Texas Legislature in Austin. Earlier this month, Disputing published the entire text of his speech in a series of three posts.

Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in American Express Corp. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, et al., No. 12-133, (June 20, 2013). The appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addressed whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) allows a court to invalidate an arbitration agreement that does not permit class arbitration of a federal law claim.