• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Number of Civil Jury Trials Conducted in Texas Reaches a 40-Year Low

0
by Beth Graham

Friday, Jul 05, 2013


Tweet

According to a recent report, the number of civil jury trials held each year across the State of Texas has declined to a 40-year low.  Instead, many civil cases are now being decided using alternative dispute resolution methods such as pretrial mediation and arbitration.  In addition, many business attorneys are apparently counseling their clients to curtail costs by avoiding a potentially risky jury trial.  In 1997, nearly 3,400 civil jury trials were conducted in Texas district courts.  Last year, that number was less than 1,200.  Similarly, federal district court judges presided over 360 civil jury trials in 1997.  In 2012, that number was down to 135.

Recent Texas and U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence supports fewer and shorter civil jury trials.  For example, the Texas Supreme Court has implemented expedited trial rules for civil cases where the amount in controversy is less than $100,000.  In addition, the Supreme Court’s recent holding in American Express v. Italian Colors Restaurant, (No. 12-133) made it impossible for a group of individuals who each signed an agreement to arbitrate any disputes with a credit card merchant to compile their claims in a class-action lawsuit.

It’s no surprise that a reduced number of civil jury trials are now being conducted in Texas.  In general, alternative dispute resolution mechanisms such as arbitration cut litigation costs and reduce the amount of time a business or individual must focus on legal troubles.  Arbitration also offers more flexibility as it can be tailored to the specific needs of the parties.  Additionally, engaging in arbitration may help parties protect confidential information and avoid the often hyper-competitive aspects of litigation which may completely destroy valuable business relationships.  Still, some are reportedly concerned that civil jury trials in Texas are “headed to extinction.”  What are your thoughts?

Related Posts

  • The Not-So-Effective Vindication DecisionThe Not-So-Effective Vindication Decision
  • U.S. Supreme Court Grants Cert to Class Arbitration CaseU.S. Supreme Court Grants Cert to Class Arbitration Case
  • The Court’s 2012 Class Act: A Little Bit of This, a Little Bit of ThatThe Court’s 2012 Class Act: A Little Bit of This, a Little Bit of That
  • ‘Sticky’ Arbitration Clauses?: The Use of Arbitration Clauses after Concepcion and Amex‘Sticky’ Arbitration Clauses?: The Use of Arbitration Clauses after Concepcion and Amex
  • Supreme Court Upholds Agreement That Bans Class Arbitration Despite CostsSupreme Court Upholds Agreement That Bans Class Arbitration Despite Costs
  • U.S. Supreme Court Decides American Express v. Italian ColorsU.S. Supreme Court Decides American Express v. Italian Colors

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy