• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


NLRB Judge Rules Houston-Based Restaurant Chain’s Collective Action Ban Violates NLRA

0
by Beth Graham

Thursday, Dec 15, 2016


Tweet

Last week, a National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) administrative law judge ruled that a Houston-based restaurant chain violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) when it required workers to sign a mandatory arbitration agreement that included a collective action waiver.  In the consolidated case, the judge also stated the restaurant chain wrongly terminated two workers who sought to engage in collective action against the company over purported wage and hour violations.  Additionally, the administrative law judge found that restaurant managers illegally coerced workers into signing the arbitration agreement by threatening to remove them from the work schedule.

After the NLRB judge found portions of the restaurant’s employee handbook to be unlawful, she issued an order directing the restaurant chain to cease and desist from maintaining the mandatory arbitration program and rescind those provisions of the handbook that violated the NLRA.  Ultimately, the case was formally transferred to the Board for review “pursuant to Section 102.45 of the National Labor Relations Board’s Rules and Regulations.”

Photo credit: Kinchan1 via Foter.com / CC BY

Related Posts

  • 5th Circuit Upholds Class Waiver Without an Arbitration Agreement5th Circuit Upholds Class Waiver Without an Arbitration Agreement
  • DOJ Flips on Class Waivers IssueDOJ Flips on Class Waivers Issue
  • SCOTUS Finally Agrees to Consider Whether Class Action Waivers Included in Employment Agreements Violate the NLRASCOTUS Finally Agrees to Consider Whether Class Action Waivers Included in Employment Agreements Violate the NLRA
  • Fifth Circuit Adheres to D.R. Horton, Upholds Class Arbitration Waiver in Employment DisputeFifth Circuit Adheres to D.R. Horton, Upholds Class Arbitration Waiver in Employment Dispute
  • NLRB Again Rules Class-Action Arbitration Waivers Violate the NLRANLRB Again Rules Class-Action Arbitration Waivers Violate the NLRA
  • Fifth Circuit Holds Class Arbitration Waivers Do Not Violate the NLRAFifth Circuit Holds Class Arbitration Waivers Do Not Violate the NLRA

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy