• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


NLRB Defers to Arbitral Decision in Healthcare Employment Dispute

0
by Beth Graham

Monday, May 13, 2013


Tweet

A National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) panel has declined to shift the burden to limit the effect of an arbitration award in a healthcare employment dispute. In Shands Jacksonville Med. Ctr. Inc., 359 NLRB No. 104 (Apr. 26, 2013), the NLRB’s Acting General Counsel requested that the board require an employer charged with unfair labor practices to demonstrate that an arbitral award meets the NLRB’s requirements for acceptance rather than require the General Counsel to prove that it does not. The Acting General Counsel’s request to shift the burden with regard to the arbitral award was made using the same reasoning as demonstrated in the Guideline Memorandum Concerning Deferral to Arbitral Awards and Grievance Settlements (Memorandum 11-05, January 20, 2011). Instead, the panel chose to defer to the arbitrator’s award that reinstated a terminated employee without providing back wages and benefits. According to the NLRB panel, all parties agreed that the arbitration proceeding was fair, each agreed to be bound by the arbitrator’s award, and the arbitrator’s decision to refrain from awarding back pay was not “clearly repugnant to the Act.”

Related Posts

  • National Labor Relations Board Issues Guidelines for Employers’ Arbitration PoliciesNational Labor Relations Board Issues Guidelines for Employers’ Arbitration Policies
  • Beaumont COA Upholds $460K Legal Malpractice Arbitration AwardBeaumont COA Upholds $460K Legal Malpractice Arbitration Award
  • Houston Federal Court Confirms Consent Award Based on New York ConventionHouston Federal Court Confirms Consent Award Based on New York Convention
  • NLRB Files Responsive Brief in Murphy Oil CaseNLRB Files Responsive Brief in Murphy Oil Case
  • SCOTX Affirms Arbitration Award, Finds No Manifest Disregard of the Law in Oil & Gas DisputeSCOTX Affirms Arbitration Award, Finds No Manifest Disregard of the Law in Oil & Gas Dispute
  • The Continuing Struggle Over Class Action Waivers in ArbitrationThe Continuing Struggle Over Class Action Waivers in Arbitration

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy