• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


New Petition Asks SCOTX to Consider Whether Arbitrator Exceeded His Authority

0
by Beth Graham

Monday, Dec 04, 2017


Tweet

A hospital has asked the Supreme Court of Texas to consider whether an arbitrator exceeded his authority in a workplace discrimination dispute.  In Methodist Healthcare System, Ltd., LLP v. Friesenhahn, No. 17-0955, a woman, Friesenhahn, was terminated by her employer, Methodist Healthcare Systems, for purportedly violating a workplace policy.  After she was fired, Friesenhahn accused her former employer of both age and gender discrimination.  Following arbitration proceedings regarding the alleged discrimination, Friesenhahn was awarded nearly $384,000 in damages and legal fees.

Next, Friesenhahn sought to confirm the arbitral award.  In response, Methodist Healthcare Systems filed a motion to vacate the arbitrator’s award.  According to the hospital, “the arbitration agreement provided for expanded judicial review and the arbitrator ignored the legal standards applicable in reviewing Friesenhahn’s discrimination claim.”  The trial court ultimately confirmed the arbitration award and ordered the hospital to pay Friesenhahn additional attorneys’ fees “for enforcing the arbitration award.”  Methodist Healthcare Systems then filed an appeal with Texas’ Fourth District Court of Appeals in San Antonio.

In October, the San Antonio Court held “the parties’ arbitration agreement did not expand judicial review; therefore, we need not consider Methodist’s argument that the trial court erred in confirming the arbitration award under an expanded judicial review.”  In addition, the appellate court stated the trial court committed error when it awarded Friesenhahn additional legal costs because she was “not entitled to recover any such additional attorney’s fees as a matter of law.”  Finally, the Court of Appeals affirmed the remainder of the lower court’s judgment.

Last week, Methodist Healthcare Systems filed a petition for review with the Supreme Court of Texas.  According to the hospital’s petition, the issues presented in the case include:

  1. Whether an arbitration award must be reviewed for legal error to determine whether the arbitrator exceeded his authority where the arbitration agreement required the arbitrator to follow legal precedent and be subject to the same limitations in granting a remedy as a court.

  2. (Unbriefed) Whether the arbitrator exceeded his power by awarding damages for discrimination when, under governing precedent, the claimant presented no evidence of discrimination.

The petition is currently being reviewed by the Texas Supreme Court Justices.   Please check back soon for future updates in this case!

Photo credit:  FreeImages.com/Hal Wilson

Related Posts

  • SCOTX Will Not Consider Whether Arbitrator Exceeded Authority in Workplace Discrimination CaseSCOTX Will Not Consider Whether Arbitrator Exceeded Authority in Workplace Discrimination Case
  • Texas Supreme Court Overturns $26 Million Arbitral Award Over Improper Arbitrator DisqualificationTexas Supreme Court Overturns $26 Million Arbitral Award Over Improper Arbitrator Disqualification
  • Petition for Review Filed Over $460K Legal Malpractice Arbitration AwardPetition for Review Filed Over $460K Legal Malpractice Arbitration Award
  • SCOTX Reverses Order Denying Arbitration in Dallas County Structured Settlement Transfer CaseSCOTX Reverses Order Denying Arbitration in Dallas County Structured Settlement Transfer Case
  • SCOTX Will Not Consider $16 Million Arbitration Award Arising Out of Energy DisputeSCOTX Will Not Consider $16 Million Arbitration Award Arising Out of Energy Dispute
  • ND Texas in Dallas Confirms $141 Million Arbitration Award in Software DisputeND Texas in Dallas Confirms $141 Million Arbitration Award in Software Dispute

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy