• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


New AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules are Now in Effect

0
by Beth Graham

Thursday, Sep 18, 2014


Tweet

On September 1st, new American Arbitration Association (AAA) Consumer Arbitration Rules went into effect. The 55 new rules reportedly replaced the eight Consumer-Related Disputes Supplementary Procedures that previously applied to consumer arbitrations filed with the organization.  The new rules apply to all arbitral cases filed after September 1, 2014.

According to the AAA:

The American Arbitration Association® (“AAA®,” “the Association”) applies the Consumer Arbitration Rules (“Rules”) to arbitration clauses in agreements between individual consumers and businesses where the business has a standardized, systematic application of arbitration clauses with customers and where the terms and conditions of the purchase of standardized, consumable goods or services are non-negotiable or primarily non-negotiable in most or all of its terms, conditions, features, or choices. The product or service must be for personal or household use. The AAA has the discretion to apply or not to apply the Consumer Arbitration Rule, and the parties are able to bring any disputes concerning the application or non-application of the Rules to the attention of the arbitrator. Consumers and businesses are permitted to seek relief in a small claims court for disputes or claims within the scope of the small claims court’s jurisdiction. These Rules were drafted and designed to be consistent with the minimum due process principles of the Consumer Due Process Protocol.

As part of the new Consumer Arbitration Rules, companies that seek to utilize the AAA’s services must submit a non-refundable fee along with their proposed consumer arbitration provision to the organization for review to ensure it “substantially and materially complies with the due process standards of the Consumer Due Process Protocol.” Following approval, the clause will be included in a newly created and publicly available Consumer Clause Registry.  Any business that fails to submit its arbitral agreement to the AAA prior to a consumer arbitration being filed with the organization will be subject to an additional fee for expedited review.

Photo credit: Karolina vslo / Foter / CC BY

Related Posts

  • GUEST-POST | Possible Outcomes for Class Arbitration Waivers in Consumer Contracts  GUEST-POST | Possible Outcomes for Class Arbitration Waivers in Consumer Contracts
  • ARBITRATION LEGITIMACY — UNCONSCIONABILITYARBITRATION LEGITIMACY — UNCONSCIONABILITY
  • Class Action Waivers in Employment Contracts: The Clash between the National Labor Relations Act and the Federal Arbitration ActClass Action Waivers in Employment Contracts: The Clash between the National Labor Relations Act and the Federal Arbitration Act
  • W. D. of Pennsylvania Addresses Optional Appeal to Second Arbitration TribunalW. D. of Pennsylvania Addresses Optional Appeal to Second Arbitration Tribunal
  • Texas Supreme Court Finds Arbitration Clause in Attorney-Client Contract Was Not Unconscionable, Against Public Policy or IllusoryTexas Supreme Court Finds Arbitration Clause in Attorney-Client Contract Was Not Unconscionable, Against Public Policy or Illusory
  • Fundamentally Unfair: An Empirical Analysis of Social Media Arbitration ClausesFundamentally Unfair: An Empirical Analysis of Social Media Arbitration Clauses

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy