• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (312) 705-9317

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


NCSC’s ‘Jury Service and Accessing Court Services Remotely in a (Post) Pandemic America’ Webinar Now Available Online

0
by Beth Graham

Monday, Jun 22, 2020


Tweet

On Thursday, the National Center for State Courts (“NCSC”) conducted a useful webinar titled, “Jury Service and Accessing Court Services Remotely in a (Post) Pandemic America: Results From a New National Public Opinion Poll.”  The webinar was designed to address the COVID-19 pandemic and provide both guidance and resources for the courts. A NCSC synopsis of the webinar states:

Join us for results and analysis of a new national opinion poll completed just days ago for the National Center for State Courts. Presenters will outline key findings on how Americans feel about the state courts during the time of a global pandemic. The session will review shifting attitudes towards the use of remote technology to receive court services; address findings about how many Americans say they have access to the tools to use those remote services; provide data on how safe people feel about reporting for jury service; and review how effective Americans think masks, social distancing and other protective measures will be in making sure a trip to the courthouse is a safe experience.

You may view a recording of the webinar and a copy of associated materials on the NCSC’s website.

Photo by: John Schnobrich on Unsplash

Related Posts

  • Using Guided Choice to Increase Satisfaction with the Value of MediatorsUsing Guided Choice to Increase Satisfaction with the Value of Mediators
  • Second Circuit Reinstates Brady’s Four-Game “Deflategate” SuspensionSecond Circuit Reinstates Brady’s Four-Game “Deflategate” Suspension
  • What the Numbers Tell Us About How State Courts Apply the Unconscionability Doctrine to Arbitration AgreementsWhat the Numbers Tell Us About How State Courts Apply the Unconscionability Doctrine to Arbitration Agreements
  • U.S. Supreme Court Denies Cert to Tobacco Arbitration Case   U.S. Supreme Court Denies Cert to Tobacco Arbitration Case
  • Fifth Circuit Rules that Arbitrator Bias Issue Must be Raised Before the Arbitration Award Is RenderedFifth Circuit Rules that Arbitrator Bias Issue Must be Raised Before the Arbitration Award Is Rendered
  • Dallas Appeals Court Compels Arbitration in Interlocutory AppealDallas Appeals Court Compels Arbitration in Interlocutory Appeal

Like this article? Share it!


  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2026, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy