• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


National Open Court Data Standards Project Moves to Implementation Phase

0
by Beth Graham

Wednesday, Jun 10, 2020


Tweet

The National Center for State Courts (“NCSC”) has completed the first phase of a data project that may help the judicial system become more efficient in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.  The project, which was supported by the Conference of State Court Administrators and the Joint Technology Committee, sought to create consistent legal definitions for use across jurisdictions.  According to the NCSC’s June 10, 2020 @ the Center newsletter:

The work involved developing a set of definitions so courts can share data in a consistent way, whether they’re in Memphis or Minneapolis. In the past, that couldn’t happen because state courts often defined seemingly clear-cut terms, such as domestic violence and trials, differently.

The project just released a Leadership Guide, which provides a project overview; a data elements spreadsheet with definitions and value lists; a User Guide of data elements in the spreadsheet, their use and mapping guidance; and technical notes.

Now the effort is moving to an implementation phase, and as the coronavirus pandemic has caused unprecedented backlogs in the courts, the timing couldn’t be better, said Nicole Waters, NCSC’s director of Research Services.

“While courts are currently struggling with shifting caseloads and facing unprecedented backlogs, court data are now more than ever needed to tell the story about exactly what support courts need right now,” Waters said.

The effort, called the National Open Court Data Standards Project, was launched in 2018 and involved dozens of people from courts, academia and other organizations who met regularly to examine criminal, juvenile, family, dependency, civil, traffic and probate cases.

The ultimate goal is to enable courts to lead the way in defining its data for those who use it, to reduce misinterpretation, and to enhance data-driven decision making on important management and policy issues, including addressing challenges caused by the coronavirus pandemic.

“I’m looking forward to the next phase of this project where we’ll offer assistance to courts that want to implement the national standards,” Waters said. “The timeline may need to be fast-tracked as courts are looking for data now to help guide their plans to reopen their doors.”

You may read the entire newsletter on the NCSC’s website.

Photo by: Kaleidico on Unsplash

Related Posts

  • American Review of International Arbitration Article | Evidence and Discovery in American Arbitration: The Problem of ‘Third Parties’American Review of International Arbitration Article | Evidence and Discovery in American Arbitration: The Problem of ‘Third Parties’
  • Supreme Court NewsSupreme Court News
  • No Longer can you Craft Your Own Arbitral Standard of ReviewNo Longer can you Craft Your Own Arbitral Standard of Review
  • Houston COA Holds Challenge to Applicability of FAA Was WaivedHouston COA Holds Challenge to Applicability of FAA Was Waived
  • Opening the Floodgates of Small Customer Claims in FINRA ArbitrationOpening the Floodgates of Small Customer Claims in FINRA Arbitration
  • Texas Appeals Court Finds No ‘Meeting of the Minds’ in Dispute Over Mediation Cancellation FeeTexas Appeals Court Finds No ‘Meeting of the Minds’ in Dispute Over Mediation Cancellation Fee

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy