• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


NADN Publishes Member Survey on ODR

0
by Beth Graham

Monday, Jul 26, 2021


Tweet

The National Academy of Distinguished Neutrals (“NADN”) recently conducted an online national survey of its members. The June 2021 survey focused largely on the paradigm shift to online dispute resolution (“ODR”) proceedings that neutrals across the United States have made since the COVID-19 pandemic began.  Of the 782 NADN members who responded, only 11 respondents reported limiting their practice to in-person proceedings during the prior year.  Meanwhile, 512 respondents made the choice to go fully remote.  In all, more than 91 percent of NADN member proceedings were conducted online in the last 12 months.

About 25 percent of NADN survey respondents reported a slowdown in cases over the previous year while 36 percent reported an uptick in proceedings.  In addition, 38 percent of NADN members who responded to the survey indicated they experienced no change in case volume.  Interestingly, more than 78 percent of neutrals surveyed stated their settlement rate was unchanged while the remaining 22 percent of survey respondents were split almost equally between whether they experienced a “better” or “worse” settlement rate during the previous 12 months.

Positives related to ODR that were reported by respondents included cost and time efficiencies, better engagement and attendance, faster resolution, and equal effectiveness to in-person proceedings.  Negative aspects reported included a lack of personal interaction, technical issues, a lower settlement rate, less engaged participants, and a need for plaintiffs to be present at proceedings.

In the coming year, survey respondents expect more than 75 percent of scheduled cases to occur online.  Only 24 of the 512 neutrals surveyed expect that all of their cases will be handled in person over the next 12 months while 112 believe they will participate exclusively in ODR proceedings.  Based solely on personal preference, however, about 47 percent of NADN members surveyed would choose ODR unless the parties insist on in-person proceedings and over 41 percent would prefer to be in-person only unless the parties insist on moving forward remotely.

More than 60 percent of NADN survey respondents indicated they were selected to serve as a neutral by clients outside of their physical location area due to the availability of ODR.  In the meantime, almost 40 percent of NADN members who responded to the survey reported raising their rates in either 2020 or 2021.  Despite this, only about 15 percent of NADN survey respondents stated they would consider charging an additional fee or premium for in-person cases.

The NADN survey results were definitely eye-opening!  If you would like more information, you may download a PowerPoint document with more details on the NADN’s recent survey results here.

Photo by:  BRUNO EMMANUELLE on Unsplash

Related Posts

  • Pouring a Little Psychological Cold Water on ODRPouring a Little Psychological Cold Water on ODR
  • Digital Accessibility and Disability Accommodations in Online Dispute Resolution: ODR for EveryoneDigital Accessibility and Disability Accommodations in Online Dispute Resolution: ODR for Everyone
  • Designing and Implementing a State Court ODR System: From Disappointment to CelebrationDesigning and Implementing a State Court ODR System: From Disappointment to Celebration
  • Expanding Access to Remedies Through E-Court InitiativesExpanding Access to Remedies Through E-Court Initiatives
  • Robot Mediator Settles Court Case for the First TimeRobot Mediator Settles Court Case for the First Time
  • Pew Charitable Trusts Calls for Standardization of US Court ODR ProgramsPew Charitable Trusts Calls for Standardization of US Court ODR Programs

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Beth Graham

Beth Graham earned a Master of Arts in Information Science and Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri-Columbia, and a Juris Doctor from the University of Nebraska College of Law, where she was an Eastman Memorial Law Scholar. Beth is licensed to practice law in Texas and the District of Columbia. She is also a member of the Texas Bar College and holds CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy